Young Conservatives of America

Cory Spruill, Ex-Edward Little High School Homosexual Football Player Sends Christians "Gay" Porn on Facebook

2011-06-27T20:14:00.000-07:00

The Young Conservatives of America (YCA) are not new to internet harrassment. In fact, the organizations positions on such issues as right to life, traditional family values, a free-market economy and a strong national defense lead members to expect some degree of harrassment by some members of their opposition.

This week however YCA experienced a new low when the organizations National Chairman sat down to check his Facebook messages.

Cory Spruill, a nineteen year old homosexual man and recent graduate of Edward Little High School who plans to attend the University of Maine had send harrassing messages, including nude and pornographic images of "acts to crude for print" in an effort to harrass the Chairman.

YCA has a zero tolerance for this type of harrasment and is currently looking into taking legal action against Mr. Spruill for internet cyber-harrasment. The photo was too graphic to post but a screen shot of his comments can be seen below.

Cory Spruill

June 7
Cory Spruill
Hey ya' big homophobe! What's up?
43 minutes ago
Cory Spruill
Hey man! I just thought you might be in the mood for some butt-f------!

Kathlene O'Loughlin: Neo-Pagan, Anti-Christian Activist Cusses Out Conservatives, Makes False Accusations

2011-06-17T16:38:00.000-07:00

Radical neo-pagan and anti-Christian activist Kathleen O'Loughlin seems to think it's o.k. to cuss people out on the internet simply because she disagrees with them about political matters.

Don't believe she's pagan?

Kathlene O'Loughlin
Marriage was not ordained by God. Marriage was a pagan ritual that Christians stole along with everything else (hello Easter anyone?) Native Americans performed two-spirit (lgbt) marriages before Columbus ever set foot here.

She went on to cuss-out a woman named Carmella, who simply disagreed with her pagan sex practices. She referred to her as a "waspy rug" and a "bigot."

Kathlene O'Loughlin
this is the 2nd time I'm blocked in 2 days because bigots want to sweep the truth under their waspy rugs.
19 minutes ago · ·
In one post she almost went off on Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg:

- Kathlene O'Loughlin I CAN'T WITH YOU PEOPLE. And I can't with facebook either for that matter, screw you zuckerberg.
  13 minutes ago · · 1 person

Apparently, Mark Zuckerberg got angry and banned her from commenting:

Kathlene O'Loughlin
Maggie, Carmella deleted my link, I waited a few seconds and posted it again and got a popup from fb saying I'm blocked because of spam. Because Carmella is a coward and censored me.

In fact, not only will she cuss you out, but if she disagrees with you, she will falsely accuse you of committing crimes. Yup! That's right folks. Argue with Kathleen about politics, and you'll be accused of committing a crime!

Folks there are very few rules on the internet. People like Kathlene O'Loughlin however stand to ruin things for the rest of us. It is time that people called out people like Kathlene for their lack of respect and blatant lies.

Should “Gays” Be a Part of the Conservative Movement Part III: Why David Swindle Should Resign from NewsReal

2011-05-09T01:10:00.000-07:00

By Ryan Sorba

Note: This is Part III of a three-part debate on whether homosexuality is compatible with conservatism. Part I can be read here and Part II here.

In my first two rounds of debate at NewsReal with editor David Swindle on the subject of “gays” and conservatism, he called me a “totalitarian,” a “neo-communist,” a “radical Islamist,” and more.

Welcome to David Horowitz’s NewsReal!

David’s cuss-out session continued undisturbed in intensity throughout the debate. He slandered conservatives who refuse to agree that the “gay” agenda is a conservative one as “stupid,” “bigots,” “liars,” “cheaters,” and “theocrats.”

Before David’s meltdown was over he referred to the natural law upon which the United States is built as “malarkey,” declared that he was “banning” me from NewsReal and urged others to do the same.

David’s inclination to censure political opponents rather than debate them remind me of the time Francois A. Houle censured Ann Coulter. Ann explains:

Francois A. Houle, the Provost of the University of Ottawa wrote me in advance of my visit to recommend that I familiarize myself with Canada's criminal laws regarding hate speech.

I was given no specific examples of what words and phrases I couldn't use, but I take it I'm not supposed to say, "F--- you, Francois."

Upon reading Francois' letter, I suddenly realized that I had just been the victim of a hate crime! And it was committed by Francois A. Houle –French, for Frank A. Hole.

One need not feel badly for Ann or me. David and A. Houle are the real victims. Both men are cowards. It must be awful to live in such terror of the truth that a man feels his only way out is to slam the door on open debate –to choose to live in darkness.

So much for David Horowitz’s, “Students for Academic Freedom!”

One might think David would exercise more restraint before “banning” people from NewsReal. After all Horowitz has been banned from speaking at St. Louis University by Scott Smith, the Dean of Student Life, twice! In the 1990’s his anti-reparation ads were banned from newspapers across America.

What would compel David to reduce himself to the status of St. Louis University’s Scott Smith –an American “A. Houle?”

David’s ostensible reasons for banning me are based in his own accusations, not reality. David claims I, “lied three times,” “cheated in a card game" and, “took a dump on the table in front of him after lunch” –the last accusation arises from his own anally-fixated mind. None of them are true.

Let’s take a closer look at each of his claims.

First, I have never played cards with David or gone to lunch with him. Sound like a ridiculous way to respond? David’s case that I lied is based on the same level of inanity.

He claims I lied about the dollar amount the federal government spends to treat HIV/AIDS infected men who have sex with men.

I indicated that two-thirds of persons infected HIV/AIDS in the United States are men who have sex with men and that total federal spending on HIV/AIDS treatment is $20.5 billion.

David specifies that the $20.5 billion includes housing allowances, research, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security Disability, a Federal Employee’s Health Benefit Plan, and prevention. He highlights that $14.1 billion is allocated for “care/treatment” specifically.

Talk about missing the forest for a tree! Is playing silly semantics games the best David can do?

David purposely refused to respond to the point of the paragraph, which is simply that men who lead the promiscuous and irresponsible homosexual lifestyle actually do affect others economically, because our tax dollars go to pay for the various effects of their STDs.

David couldn’t refute the point, so he attempted to take his reader’s eye off the ball by accusing me of “lying” for using the word “treatment” broadly. How pathetic.

The mere fact that he attempts this equivocation is a sure sign he has nothing of actual significance to attack in my argument.

David’s second allegation is more offensive. He claims I “lied” about conservative icon Ronald Reagan’s position on the so-called “gay” movement. I never lied. In fact, he did.

David cited the fact that Ronald Reagan was opposed to the Briggs Initiative as evidence Reagan believed the homosexual lifestyle is compatible with conservatism.

Reagan actually opposed teaching children about the dangerous homosexual lifestyle in schools, and therefore supported the general spirit of the Briggs Initiative:

I don’t approve of teaching a so-called ‘gay’ lifestyle in our schools…

Reagan opposed the Briggs Initiative because he considered it redundant. Reagan believed the legal machinery was already in place to deal with adults who expose school children to sexual perversion:

…there is already adequate legal machinery to deal with such problems if and when they arise.

David claimed the Briggs Initiative was not about “teaching homosexuality in schools.” If it wasn’t then why did Ronald Reagan specify his opposition to the Briggs Initiative within the context of redundancy? Of course the spirit of the Briggs Initiative was about exposing children to the dangerous homosexual lifestyle. The verbiage of the initiative makes that clear in black and white script letters:

For these reasons, the State finds a compelling interest in refusing to employ and in terminating the employment of a school teacher, a teacher’s aid, a school administrator or a counselor…who engages in public homosexual activity and/or public homosexual conduct directed at, or likely to come to the attention of, school children or other school employees. [Emphasis mine]

David took half of Ronald Reagan’s letter in opposition to the Briggs Initiative and presented it to his readers it as if it were the whole thing, conveniently censuring those aspects of Reagan with which he personally disagrees –that is lie #1.

David claims Reagan believed homosexuality was compatible with conservatism. Against David stands Ronald Reagan on the role of government in relation
to homosexuality:

We will resist the efforts of some to obtain government endorsement of homosexuality.

Ronald Reagan on “gays” and HIV/AIDS:

Maybe the Lord brought down this plague [because] illicit sex is against the Ten Commandments.

Ronald Reagan’s hand-picked Supreme Court appointees Antonin Scalia and William Rehnquist upheld anti-sodomy statutes in Bowers v Hardwick.

David claims Reagan would allow practitioners of the unnatural vice to openly represent conservatism, but due to Reagan’s Supreme Court appointees they weren’t permitted to openly represent themselves.

David further claims that conservatism ought to ban God and Religious belief from influencing legal proscription:

As demonstrated by my definition of conservatism, the movement is not grounded in a common religious or moral understanding of personal behavior…That’s why it’s perfectly rational to have…Pagan conservatives.

Ronald Reagan believed the exact opposite of David:

Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged.

Publicly David claims that the “gay” socio-political construct and the cultural Marxist agenda which gives it context are compatible with conservatism. Privately however, he declares his views on social issues unchanged since his days as a leftist:

My views on so-called ‘social issues’ remain largely unchanged from my college leftist days. I still see nothing morally wrong with homosexuality. I wish gay marriage was legal. I think abortions within the first trimester should be legal. Pornography among consenting adults should not be regulated by the government. And all drugs should be decriminalized.

Claiming to be a conservative and then stating that your views remain largely unchanged from your college leftist days is lie # 2, David.

David isn’t only a leftist on social issues. Apparently he is a libertarian too.

As a social libertarian I loathe the idea of government trying to impose the right way to live morally.

That is lie # 3.

David lies as easily as he breathes. He implies that he also represents conservatism on social issues:

So where does this leave conservatives on the question of gay marriage? The same place where gays are…There are gays who support gay marriage, civil unions, and the status quo of no government recognition whatsoever. Therefore, why should there be a “conservative” position on the issue?

After forbidding the conservative movement in general from taking a position on marriage, David presents a position the movement should take up! His position is that conservatives should not take a position, and that is, in fact, a position in itself. He goes on to declare that this “debate is not about gay marriage...” after bringing the issue up himself.

The contradictions of the medieval church or seventeenth century French letters don’t match David’s’ level of hypocrisy.

David also declares himself a libertine:

And for someone as agnostic, libertine, and absurdly open-minded as myself that’s practically impossible.

Your entire political position is impossible, David. That is lie number 4!

This “left-wing, conservative, libertarian, libertine” who contradicts himself more times than the Marquis de Sade is so open minded that his brains have fallen out.

Andrew Breitbart called Ted Kennedy a “duplicitous bastard” for less. I wonder what he might call David? Perhaps a “quadra-plicitous bastard” if it wasn’t so clunky?” No matter, I hereby dub David, “Mr. Swindle” -a fitting name for a liar.

Mr. Swindle accuses me of calling Andrew Breitbart “gay.” Well, I had good reason to believe Andrew Breitbart was going “full gay.” Apparently, so did Philadelphia magazine. In fact, Andrew Breitbart had to trot out his “correction Alpaca” to make clear to the world that he is not a homosexual. What does it matter Breitbart? Are you a "homophobe?" Democratic Party officials have also mistaken Andrew Breitbart for a homosexual.

Why all the fuss about Andrew Breitbart?

For starters Andrew Breitbart joined the Executive Board of an openly homosexual organization. He takes photos like this, which suggest he seeks to French kiss another man, and this, standing behind I sign which reads “Proud Gay…” Andrew Breitbart also organized a “Big Gay Eighties Dance Party” to make a mockery of CPAC. How can Mr. Swindle criticize me for making such an honest mistake?

Further, Andrew Breitbart, Greg Gutfeld, and Tammy Bruce have been accusing opponents of homosexual behavior of engaging in it themselves for months. How can Breitbart act as though he is offended when someone makes an honest mistake about him, especially after he called my Facebook photo sitting with my surfboard a “Blue Boy Test Shot?”

Mr. Swindle accuses me of taking a dump on the table in front of him for making a very honest mistake about Andrew Breitbart on my personal Facebook page. That analogy would better suit Mr. Swindle’s wife’s pornography.

In the end Mr. Swindle lost the debate. His cowardly attempt to win-by-censure backfired leading many of his own readers to declare yours-truly the winner.

Atlas_Collins made his position clear:

David lost the debate when he ‘banned’ Sorba.

BDouglasAF1980 had a message for Mr. Swindle:

Admit you are a libertarian and be happy with it.

Calvin Frieberger reacted thusly to Mr. Swindle's position on GOProud:

You’re going to ignore GOProud's well-established record of anti-conservative antagonism and expect conservatives to tolerate an organization run by one of conservatism's worst possible enemies?

NewsReal contributor Lisa Graas praised my stance on the issue:

I applaud Ryan Sorba for taking his time at CPAC to stand for natural law and submit himself to ridicule by those who purport to be “conservative.”

Not only did Mr. Swindle stick his fingers in his ears and sing “LaLaLaLaLa” when he “banned” me, as Atlas_Collins wrote, but he was also accused of deleting comments critical to his position during almost every round –and he has the nerve to accuse me of cheating in a card game?

In this debate Mr. Swindle falsely accused me of “lying three times.” He cited these three lies specifically as grounds for “banning me from NewsReal.” I have addressed and corrected Mr. Swindle's false accusations for the public record here. It should now be clear to readers that I did not “lie three times.”

Now I would like to know if Mr. Swindle is willing to play by his own rules.

Mr. Swindle made the argument that anyone who lies three times should be banned from NewsReal Blog. In this article I showed that he lied 4 times himself.

Will Mr. Swindle be consistent and ban himself from NewsReal, or will he commit lie # 5 by staying on board as editor? Will he ignore his own inconsistency and further discredit his own objectivity as an editor? Will he prove his pretenses to ban political opponents as ad hoc and whimsical?

Perhaps David can remain at NewsReal Blog without hypocrisy if he offers me an apology for his false and quite literally vile accusations, and then retracts his previous article of lies, but I doubt he is man enough to do the "Right" thing. You know what they say, “Once a cheater always a cheater.”

Good luck to you in your endeavors, “Mr. Swindle,” you are going to need it. Rest assured, you’ve made an enemy outta me. Ya you. You’ve made an enemy outta me.

By Ryan Sorba

David Swindle

2011-05-08T21:55:00.002-07:00

Perez Hilton Displays Strong Anti-Christian Bias, Not "Born Gay"

2011-04-15T11:17:00.001-07:00

By Ryan Sorba

Reacting to a recent Advocate.com article titled “Conservatives Declare War on the Word ‘Gay’” self-proclaimed “gay” internet sensation Mario Armando Lavandeira Jr., better known by his fake name Perez Hilton, launched into vitriolic attacks, calling Christian's “HOrrific.”

He went on to accuse all who adhere to the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic of hiding a “dispecable [sic] “homaphobia [sic],” simply for acknowledging the fact that ex-"gays" exist and that studies show change is possible for those who truly seek it.

Lavandeira’s cuss-out session, (or perhaps his sister Barbara Lavandeira’s cuss out session?) continued undisturbed in intensity. He went on to tag his post about Christians who refuse to agree that the “gay” agenda is a moral one as “bull sh--,” “bigots,” “offensive,” and “deplorable.”

Welcome to Holly-weird!

None of this language comes as a surprise. Mario and Barbara Lavandeira built their online empire as cyber-bullies, tearing people down like former Miss California, USA, Carrie Prejean, Hilary Duff, Chris Brown, Vanessa Hudgens, and the list goes on.

In 2010 Mario was accused of shooting and posting a panty-less photo of Miley Cyrus, who was only seventeen years old at the time, to his Twitter account, which included more than two million followers.

Now “Perez Hilton” has the nerve to declare Christians who stand for sexual decency “dipecable” [sic] for refusing to agree with the notion that people are “born gay.”

Why should Christians believe that people are “born gay,” Mario? Self-avowed “gays” don’t even believe that they were “born that way.”

Sorry Lady Gaga!

Homosexual activists openly admit—in numerous magazines, newspaper articles, books, and even national television shows—that people can and do change their so-called “sexual orientation.”

Activists who hold the view that human sexuality is fluid and flexible, (some publicly, some privately) are the same activists held up as heroes by the so-called “gay” community.

Take pro-sodomy activist Lillian Faderman for example. In the September 5, 1995 edition of the Advocate she stated the following:

We continue to demand rights, ignoring the fact that human sexuality is fluid and flexible, acting as though we are all stuck in our category forever. The narrow categories of identity politics are obviously deceptive.

The architects of the pro-sodomy movement Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen urge activists to abandon the truth for practical purposes:

It is time to learn from Madison Avenue and to roll out the big guns. We are talking about propaganda. For all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay –even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence.

Self-described “lesbian” Jennie Ruby agrees in a Lambda Book Report article:

I don’t think lesbians are born. I think they are made. The gay rights movement has (for many good, practical reasons) adopted largely an identity politics.

John DeCecco, from San Francisco State University, the editor of the Journal of Homosexuality and Paedika: The Journal of Pedophilia agrees:

The whole born gay and immutable characteristic idea is just gay and lesbian politics and aimed at achieving gay rights.

Dr. Vera Whisman is a lecturer for the Queer Studies Department at Ithaca College in New York. In her book, Queer by Choice: Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Politics of Identity she writes the following:

My conclusions question some of the fundamental basis upon which the gay and lesbian rights movement has been built. If we cannot make political claims based on an essential and shared nature, are we not left once again as individual deviants? Without an essentialist [born gay] foundation, do we have a viable politics?

Other well-known leaders of the “gay” political movement have acknowledged and/or observed the fluidity of sexuality in their own lives, as the following list indicates:

Camille Paglia

Tammy Bruce

Greg Louganis

Ellen Degeneres

Anne Heche

Chastity Bono

Joanne Loulan

Sarah Schulman

Rita Mae Brown

Rebecca Walker

Joan Nestle

John Preston

Dr. Martin Duberman

Dr. Charles Silverstein

Donna Minkowitz

Dr. Pat Cain

Martina Navratilova

Janis Ian

Melissa Etheridge

Wendy Caster

Kate Kendall

Dr. Dean Hamer

Dr. Karla Jay

Pat Califia

Susie Bright

The list goes on and on. Do Mario Lavandeira (Perez Hilton) and Stefani Jonanne Angelina Germanotta (Lady Gaga) really think the American public is naïve enough to believe their “born gay” lies?

Public “born gay” propaganda is a hoax. The things activists say about themselves publicly (and the negative things they say about their opponents) are carefully calculated lies.

Even when Jewish or Christian opponents of “born gay” rhetoric are saying what pro-“gay” activists know to be true, the activists deliberately lie about and demonize their opponents –and their message.

Pro-sodomy activists will even tell vicious lies about inciting violence to try to censor their opponent’s views in various forms of media.

This desire to censor the truth about the fluidity of same-sex attraction from the public is one of the most offensive characteristics of the practically neo-pagan pro-sodomy political movement –which habitually deceives, psychologically manipulates and even physically intimidates the media, public officials, the religious and medical communities, and anyone else they see as a threat to their lies.

One of the reasons activists want to censure opponents on the “born gay” issue is because the public would not support the “gay rights” agenda if the public knew that persons who have developed same-sex attraction are capable of change.

Several prominent “born gay” hoax activists have admitted to knowledge of this fact about the American public.

“Born gay” hoaxter Simon LeVay, who analyzed the hypothalamus in an effort to convince the world people are “born gay” revealed his secret objectives in an interview with The Advocate, June 1, 1993:

The Advocate: Do you really think that grounding homosexuality in biology can help win political equality? LeVay: All the civil rights legislation passed in the 60s is based on the knowledge that there is a genetic and immutable difference between blacks and whites. Of course, blacks are still discriminated against, but the legal advances they’ve made are based on those genetic differences. And I think that is a major stumbling block for our gaining the same protection as other groups.

There is a survey in the New York Times that broke down people on the basis of whether they thought gays and lesbians were born that way or whether it was a lifestyle choice. Across the board, those who thought gays and lesbians were born that way were more liberal and gay friendly.

The founder of the “Lesbian Avengers,” Sarah Schulman admits that lesbianism is a choice. She took note of the same study in her book My American History:

A recent poll in the New York Times showed that more people would be willing to support gay rights if they believed that gay people genetically could not help their orientation.

Pro-sodomy activists know that they are extremely vulnerable on this “born gay” point, which is one important reason why they are so desperate to have their opponents views censored by the media, and when possible, censored by the government.

In the Netherlands, activists have already succeeded in getting such a censorship law passed by the government. A Roman Catholic Bishop has faced prosecution there for making what “born gay” activists consider a negative statement about their behavior in a Roman Catholic seminary. The “Gay Times” reports:

Anti-gay Dutch Catholic Bishop may be prosecuted.

The bishop of the Roman Catholic diocese of Groningen in the northern Netherlands is under investigation for breaking a Dutch law, reports Rex Wockner.

In a lecture at Rolduc seminary, Bishop Wim Eijk told students that homosexuals suffered from ‘neurotic development disorder’ and said lesbians and gay men are incapable of making the commitment required for marriage.

The bishop’s controversial statements come at a time when the Dutch parliament is considering whether to introduce laws to allow lesbians and gay men to marry.

According to reports, laws banning discrimination against lesbians and gay men take precedence over freedom of religion and speech in the Netherlands.

Pro-“gay” activists are pushing to pass similar fascist laws all over the world. In fact, that’s what the left-wing socio-political construct that is the “gay” identity is all about –subjecting all people who disagree with the dangerous homosexual lifestyle to censorship and prosecution.

Now the health and happiness—even the lives—of many, and the common good of society depend upon the exposition and opposition of these lies and their destructive results.

By Ryan Sorba

Young Conservatives of America

2011-02-25T14:41:00.001-08:00

Boston Globe, New York Times, BBC, NPR owe Scott Lively an apology

2011-02-04T00:23:00.000-08:00

By Bryan Fischer

In Uganda, a leading homosexual activist, David Kato, was murdered last Wednesday, beaten with a hammer in his home and dying on his way to the hospital. Scott Lively, author of a well-researched and heavily documented book, The Pink Swastika, has been blamed for his death.

Even while admitting that the murder was "still being investigated," the Boston Globe was quick to lay the blame at Lively's doorstep, who, along with other pro-family experts, visited Uganda in the spring of 2009 to raise awareness of the many social and health pathologies associated with homosexual behavior.

The New York Times, the BBC and NPR all interviewed Lively in recent weeks, trying to blame him for what they believe is a rising tide of homicidal anti-gay fervor in Uganda.

Last Friday, the Globe quoted the leader of one of Uganda's leading homosexual activist groups: "David's death is a result of the hatred planted in Uganda by U.S. evangelicals in 2009. The Ugandan government and the so-called U.S. evangelicals must take responsibility for David's blood."

And it turns out that the Globe, the New York Times, the BBC and NPR are not alone in fingering Lively as an accomplice. Google "David Kato murder, Scott Lively" this morning, and you will get 17,200 hits. Almost all of this scapegoating was done, mind you, before police had any idea who had swung the hammer.

Well, it turns out that Lively had absolutely nothing, nada, zip, zilch to do with any part of this gruesome killing.

According to Reuters, a man has now confessed to the killing, and police are saying a "personal disagreement" let to Kato's untimely death. Meaning, of course, the whole thing had nothing to do with Lively or any other pro-family leader in America.

In fact, the police spokesman said quite pointedly that the murder "wasn't a robbery and it wasn't because Kato was an activist." So the whole hate crime meme is out the window, gone, history, in the archives.

The confessed murderer, one Nsubuga Enock, is a "well-known thief," according to police, and had been in prison until January 24. He had been staying with Kato since getting out.

Enock was arrested at his girlfriend's house, and so it appears that he swings both ways. Kato's driver has also been arrested in connection with the murder, and early reports indicated that both money and clothing were missing. And since Enock was in prison for theft, the dots aren't too hard to connect here.

Now the Daily Monitor is reporting that Enock has told police that he killed Kato because Kato had "coerced him into sodomy." Kato had promised to give him a car, a house and money in exchange for sexual favors, but when Kato didn't keep his end of the bargain and continued to attempt to force himself on Enock sexually, he bought a hammer and beat him to death with it.

Read More...

The following was written by Ryan Sorba:

Below is a photo of left-wing activists Rob Anderson, the Boston Globe reporter guilty of blood libel for blaming homosexual violence on Christian Pastor Scott Lively. Rob Anderson ought to be fired from the Boston Globe for making such serious accusations based on zero evidence. The accusations can be seen here.

"Progressive" Rallyists Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas

2011-02-03T14:42:00.000-08:00

Last weekend at an anti-Charles Koch Rally led by Code Pink in Palm Springs California two Young Conservatives of California members, Christian Hartsock and Alvaro Day, used kid-genius James O'Keefe strategies to uncover "progressives" calling for the "lynching of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas." Incredible.

This is the height of hyposcrisy considering that these are the very liberals who have been calling TEA Partiers "racists."

The video will appear on FOX News' Glenn Beck tonight. Check local listings for showtimes.

Culture of Vice

2011-02-02T22:42:00.000-08:00

By Robert R. Reilly

Robert Reilly notes that a society can withstand any number of persons who try to advance their own moral disorders as public policy. But society cannot survive once it adopts the justifications for those moral disorders as its own. This is what is at stake in the culture war.

In The Ethics Aristotle wrote, "men start revolutionary changes for reasons connected with their private lives." This is also true when revolutionary changes are cultural. What might these "private" reasons be, and why do they become public in the form of revolutionary changes? The answer to these questions lies in the intimate psychology of moral failure.

For any individual, moral failure is hard to live with because of the rebuke of conscience...

For more click here.

MURDER IN UGANDA

2011-02-02T11:02:00.000-08:00

by Pastor Scott Lively J.D., PhD, ThD

Evidence from murder points to personal matters, say the police, and the suspect, Kato’s (“gay?”) housemate, remains at large.

Uganda is being murdered. The nation once called “The Pearl of Africa” by Winston Churchill, a lush and beautiful country as fertile as the Nile Delta.

It is the nation that retained its self-rule through centuries of African colonialism, the society that survived even the atrocities of the cannibal cultist Idi Amin, the culture that has been thriving in Christian revival for over a dozen years.

This great and honorable nation, alone in Africa to have all but conquered the scourge of AIDS through abstinence - and whose First Lady led a holy gathering of thousands of believers on the eve of the millennium, dedicating her homeland “to Jesus Christ for a thousand years” - this Uganda, a shining light in the Dark Continent, is being murdered.

The murderers are the lavender Marxists, the now-global network of sexual revolutionaries bent on remaking the entire world in their own perverted image, whose juggernaut has toppled even once mighty Britain, crushing under their lavender boots after eight centuries the symbol of its Christian power: the Magna Carta, whose first principle had proclaimed “The English church must be free!”

These revolutionists of Sodom, who march triumphantly through all the major cities of the western world to flaunt their defeat of moral law, and who hold both Hollywood and the heart of America’s president in their iron grip: These very same zealots have fixed their malevolent gaze on Christian Uganda.

Uganda is the only country in the world with a national holiday commemorating its rejection of sexual perversion. Every June 3 it honors the 22 young men and boys who were tortured and roasted alive in 1886 by homosexual King Mwanga, because they refused to submit to sodomy. Is it any wonder, then, that Uganda has reacted violently against the army of agitators, led by George Soros, who now seek to re-homosexualize Ugandan culture?

It is as if the militant ranks of “Code Pink” were transported back to 1890s America to agitate for “sexual freedom.” Our great grandparents would not have countenanced this. There would have been violence, as there has now been in Uganda.

That is, of course, the strategy:

Agents provocateur goad unsophisticated natives into over-reacting, while the “gay” media lie in wait to catch the images and spin the propaganda that is even now poisoning the gullible against the Ugandans.

Ugandan homosexual activist David Kato was recently beaten to death with a hammer -a horrific crime. These very media have rushed eagerly to judge this a hate crime and to blame those, like me, who have spoken against homosexuality in Uganda. It is the central (but patently false) narrative of the left that all criticism of homosexuality leads inevitably to violence and murder.

Despite propagandistic tactics evidence from the murder points to "personal matters," say the police, and the suspect, Kato’s (“gay?”) housemate, remains at large.

There is indeed evil in Uganda today, but it is not the reaction of Christian and Moslem citizens to the rape of their culture. It is the pink-gloved hand of western powers that are cutting the throat of Africa’s most God-fearing country, and one of the world‘s most promising Christian democracies.

Here is the final vindication:

“We have taken him to Mukono Magistrate’s Court to record an extrajudicial statement,” the source said. “He told us that he killed Kato after he failed to give him a car, a house and money he promised as rewards for having sex with him,” the source said.

Kato is alleged to have bailed the suspect out of Kawuga Prison on January 24, where he has been remanded on charges of theft of a mobile phone. The suspect told police that he stayed with Kato for two days. He accused the deceased of having sex with him and promising to pay him during the period.

By Scott Lively
President, Defend the Family International
http://www.defendthefamily.com/

Ryan Sorba Appears on Glenn Beck for Helping to Take Down ACORN

2011-01-31T02:46:00.001-08:00

Ryan Sorba appears on Glenn Beck for participating in the famous 2009 ACORN investigation.

Ryan Sorba on CNN, Right on the Edge

2011-01-31T02:41:00.000-08:00

Ryan Sorba appears on Right on the Edge - a CNN Documentary about Young Conservatives Taking on the Mainstream Media

Ryan Sorba on Countdown with Keith Olberman

2011-01-31T02:14:00.000-08:00

Ryan Sorba on COUNTDOWN with Keith Olberman, MSNBC

Ryan Sorba on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

2011-01-31T02:09:00.000-08:00

Pro-family activist Ryan Sorba appears on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.

Ryan Sorba on CNN, Right on the Edge

2011-01-31T02:05:00.000-08:00

Ryan Sorba appears on CNN's Right on the Edge, a documentary about young conservatives taking on the mainstream media.

Ryan Sorba on CNN, Right on the Edge

2011-01-31T01:51:00.001-08:00

Ryan Sorba appears in CNN's Right on the Edge -a documentary about young conservatives taking on the mainstream media.

Ryan Sorba on CNN

2011-01-31T01:45:00.001-08:00

RINO Watch List: Jesse Hathaway

2010-12-29T16:08:00.000-08:00

Jesse Hathaway is a victim of "the progressive re-education camps of Ohio University and the People’s Republik of Athens." Since he completed his degree, probably in "Queer Theory," this brainwashed former O-H-I-O student has become a bonofied left-wing pro-sodomy activist, who for some reason thinks he's a conservative.

In an article entitled "Teh Ghey" Jesse outs himself on David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog as the moral equivalent of a true-blue dues paying Radical Faerie. In a few decades he'll be found under the big Alex Knepper tent, no doubt.

In case you're interested, aside from long walks on beautiful Myrtle Beach, SC this homosexualist also enjoys "getting curious and poking his nose where it doesn't belong", and long winded fallacies. He especially loves the following appeal-to-ridicule, in response to hearing that seven conservative groups have exercised their God-given libereties to pull out of the David Keene, Grover Norquist and Lisa De Pasquale event that many are now referring to as FudgePAC 2011, (here's why) formerly referred to as the Conservative Political Action Conference:

"...some leading social conservatives were afraid that they would catch the virulent and deadly virus called “Teh Ghey,” if they were seen in public with conservative people who were sexually attracted to members of the same sex."

This quote needs no response, as it is absolutely hilarious. Mr. Hathaway is also fond of thought terminating cliche's:

"I’m a bit fuzzy on why it matters what a person does in the privacy of his or her bedroom, as long as it doesn’t affect me, and is legal."

I could go on and on with the fallacies, but hey I'll dive in here, onto this rhetorical question (he wishes) since it looks nice and soft to me. Secret vices have a way of not staying secret, Mr. Hathaway, especially when they result in big public consequences that provide perfectly intelligible reasons for legal proscription, or, short of that, non-legally coercive public efforts to discourage them.

Public Consequence Number 1: $20,500,000,000 per year in government spending on HIV.

Is that expensive enough for you to declare sodomy a public issue Mr. Hathaway? If not then what would be? A trillion dollars? The federal budget request for fiscal year 2011 includes a total of $20.5 billion for domestic HIV and AIDS, a 5% increase from the FY 2010 funding, which totaled $19.4 billion.

According to the Journal of the American Medical Association approximately three out of four American AIDS patients have been males who have chosen to participate in the homosexual lifestyle and every single incedent could have been prevented. Talk about one man's personal irresponsibility effecting others. I don't think there is a better example! I haven't even gotten into the devestation they cause their own mothers and family members when they have to come clean and announce that they have contracted a mortal disease like HIV. The heartbreak must be unreal and drawn out over years. I don't even want to think about it, it's so sad.

Domestic federal funding for AIDS programs falls into four basic categories: care and treatment, financial and housing assistance, prevention, and research. Of these four budgets, care spending is by far the largest - just over half of the FY 2010 budget request is for care and treatment programs. The majority of AIDS care funding goes out through the federal Medicare and Medicaid programs for people who do not have adequate private health insurance.

Now, that is just for HIV. Imagine the public costs associated with treating the psychological and other physical diseases associated with the homosexual lifestyle. The health consequences associated with sodomy are rediculous. Here are a few more stats from the Journal of the American Medical Association for you to peruse good sir. Compared to other men, males who engage in same-sex conduct are:

727 percent more likely to have suffered bipolar disorders at some point in their lives, and 502 percent more likely in the last twelve months.

718 percent more likely to have suffered obsessive-compulsive disorder in the last twelve months, and 620 percent more likely at some point in their lives.

632 percent more likely to have suffered agoraphobia (fear of leaving home or being in public) in the last twelve months, and 454 percent more likely at some point in their lives.

421 percent more likely to have suffered panic disorder, and 229 percent more likely to have suffered social phobia at some point in their lives.

375 percent more likely to have suffered simple phobia in the last twelve months, and 361 percent more likely at some point in their lives.

311 percent more likely to have suffered mood disorders at some point in their lives, and 293 percent more likely in the last twelve months.

261 percent more likely to have suffered anxiety disorders in the last twelve months, and 267 percent more likely over the course of their lifetimes.

270 percent more likely to have suffered two or more psychiatric disorders during their lifetime.

235 percent more likely to have suffered major depression at some point in their lives.

Compared to other women, females who engage in same-sex conduct are:

405 percent more likely to have suffered a substance use disorder.

241 percent more likely to have suffered mood disorders during their lifetimes.

209 percent more likely to have suffered two or more mental disorders during their lifetimes.

etc. etc. etc.

The list of diseases found with extraordinary frequency among male homosexual practitioners as a result of anal sex include: anal cancer, chlamydia trachomatis, cryptosporidium, giardia lablia, herpes simplex virus, HIV, HPV, isospora belli, microsporidia, gonorrhea, viral hepatitis types B and C, syphilis, Gay Bowel Syndrome and other sexually transmitted gastrointestinal syndromes.
Lesbians are also at increased risk for certain diseases, including HIV, cancer, hepatitis C, and bacteria vaginosis, predominantly because they are “significantly more likely to report past sexual contact with a homosexual or bisexual man and sexual contact with an IDU (intravenous drug user). The average "lesbian" has more male sex partners in her lifetime than does the average straight woman.

With the prevalence of disease—both physical and mental—among those who engage in sodomy, it should come as no surprise that the supposedly inconsequential private vice called sodomy carries with it a long laundry list of very real public consequences, that effect you, me, and our wallets too.

There you have it Jesse. I hope that answers your question about some of the public consequences of private vice. Be sure to tune in tomorrow when I take another liberal posing as a conservative to task.

RINO Watch List: Lisa DePasquale

2010-12-29T14:29:00.000-08:00

Recently Lisa De Pasquale, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) Director for the American Conservative Union has been lobbying to bring the pro-sodomy advocacy organization "GOProud" to the CPAC, one of several large conservative gatherings that take place in Washington D.C. each year.

Lisa De Pasquale's decision is highly controversial, leaving many questioning whether she should continue at ACU as CPAC Director.

Joe Cox, the Director of Online Relations for the Young Conservatives of California had this to say:

"Homosexuality is not something most Americans are comfortable discussing, let alone promoting. So why is Lisa De Pasquale hijacking the Conservative Political Action Conference in an effort to use its name as a public relations tool for the gay agenda?"

It seems that Mr. Cox is correct. According to recent online polling more Americans than ever support a Federal Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman. This strong public showing of support for traditional marriage and morality stands in sharp contrast to the legal opinions of several activist Judges, including most recently Judge Vaughn Walker, who attempted to subvert California's recent marriage amendment known as Proposition 8.

With such strong general support for marriage and rising support for the sanctity of life in the abortion debate, many are wondering why Lisa De Pasquale is pushing social conservatives away from CPAC. It just doesn't make sense.

Recently seven social/fiscal conservative non-profits pulled out of CPAC in response to Pasquale's controversial decision, including the Family Research Council, which puts on the massive Family Values Voters Summit in Washington each year.

Other organizations that pulled out of CPAC include The Concerned Women for America, The National Organization for Marriage, the American Principles Project, American Values, the Center for Military Readiness, and Liberty Council.

On December 29th Brent Bozell, the nephew of Bill Buckley Jr and chairman of the Media Research Center indicated that MRC may not attend the CPAC either this year.

Alberto Arellano, a College Republican from UC Riverside wonders if Lisa De Pasquale is actually doing more harm than good for conservative efforts to restore public support.

"Lisa De Pasquale is trying to foist the homosexual agenda upon the conservative movement and a lot of us don't like it. We conservatives are the ones least likley to tolerate the immoral homosexual lifestyle, let alone promote it. This is rediculous" stated Arellano. "Why is she doing this?" he asks.

Many conservatives, including Arellano and Cox are hoping that Miss De Pasquale will change her mind or else step down as the CPAC Director at the American Conservative Union.

"Miss De Pasquale is not representing the principles of social conservatives, and social conservatives make up a major wing of the conservative movement. So I don't think she should be in charge of a conference that is meant to represent all conservatives, like CPAC does."

By Courtney McCarty

The “GOProud” Agenda

2010-12-28T15:03:00.000-08:00

Andrew Breitbart, GOProud Board Member

Recently a group of radical pro-“gay” activists, Christopher Barron, Jimmy LeSalvia, and Bruce Carroll put together a small card board box organization designed to make headlines and headway. The organization is called GOProud, and its leaders are dedicated to doing whatever it takes to conjure up the illusion that the American right, has gone left, on social issues. The organization’s mission:

"We are a gay organization, we only work on gay issues, we have never claimed otherwise. My God people."

The aforementioned tweet was posted at 4:04 p.m. on Aug. 4, by Christopher Barron -the organizations founder. GOProud claims to be “conservative,” but Barron’s primary-venture, CapSouth Consulting provides services almost exclusively to “centrist” organizations such as the Log Cabin Republicans and the Republicans Who Care Individual Fund – a 527 seeking to elect centrist’s to the House and Senate. The GOProud webpage states that the organization is committed to a “traditional conservative agenda,” but the very nature of the group, its questionable ties and short track record strongly suggests otherwise.

Since its inception GOProud has repeatedly attacked conservatives and TEA Party icons like Sarah Palin, Jim DeMint, and Mike Pence for supporting marriage and apposing their radical “GOProud” agenda. They attacked numerous TEA Party candidates during the 2010 campaign season. They even attacked long-standing conservative not-for-profit organizations like Americans for the Defense of Tradition, Family, and Property and the conservative youth group Young Americans for Freedom (YAF), founded by William F. Buckley Jr., the oldest and most respected group of its kind.

Despite GOProud’s self-avowed conservatism, many are beginning to wonder whether the organization should be considered “conservative” at all, arguing that GOProud has repeatedly put its own radical “gay” agenda first, and economics, party unity and “tradition” second. This some argue, marks a stark difference between GOProud and most other conservative organizations.

Traditionally, conservative not-for-profit organizations consider themselves conservative only when their core principles coincide with that of the general conservative movement. If the primary issue of an organization is at odds with conservatism, it would be odd for that organization to refer to itself as “conservative,” strictly speaking, but this is exactly what is happening with GOProud. Why?

The answer seems obvious. Christopher Barron, Jimmy LeSalvia, and Bruce Carroll are trying to co-opt the conservative movement. They want to use the movement to normalize homosexuality, nothing more. More specifically, they want to use the “free-market” as a vehicle to promote their radical agenda and to divide and conquer their opposition. If these activists do lobby for less taxes, less government, etc. they will do it with one aim in mind: to build support for the homosexual lifestyle among conservatives and disunity between social and fiscal members of the movement. This will be evident by the way they take credit for their work. This principle is implicit in the very name of their organization, which reeks of homosexuality. If they befriend conservatives they will befriend them to reduce right-wing opposition or to build support for the homosexual lifestyle.

Grover Norquist, the crypto-Islamist and founder of “American’s for Tax Reform” used the same tactic to promote radical Islam when he founded the Islamic “Free-Market” Institute. Norquist obtained the funds for his ostensibly conservative “Institute” from Abdurahman Alamoudi, a Muslim radical serving a 22 year Federal Prison sentence for funding terrorists, including Al Qaeda. Interestingly, Grover Norquist recently joined the Board of GOProud.

If GOProud truly was an organization full of nothing-but harmless fiscal conservatives who just happened to participate in the homosexual lifestyle, then why would the organization feel the absolute need to advertise the fact that they lead a homosexual lifestyle in all they do? Homosexuality is not a conservative issue. Check it at the door. Why do these activists define themselves by their sexual acts rather than their fiscal positions? Neither the title nor the track record of GOProud seem “conservative” to me. Russell Kirk, the man who gave the modern American conservative movement its name, referred to men of unprincipled talents such as these as, “sophists and calculators,” even “Jacobins!”

Normalizing the homosexual lifestyle never was or will be a conservative issue. Conservative principles all align against homosexuality. In the words of the founder, “The conservative believes in an enduring moral order, that human nature is fixed, in continuity, and that prescription and prudence are the best methods by which to reconcile permanence and change in a vigorous society.”

These principles all level the notion that there could be a conservative homosexual organization. GOProud is a fiction, a lie, designed to manipulate public sentiment, nothing more. It is the duty of every true conservative to stand up against this heresy here and now, to pinch the wick before this burning energy has time to find the winds of the radical left and together their conflagration becomes the bonfire of true conservatism, Christianity and the natural family.

Are People Born Gay?

2010-12-28T14:43:00.001-08:00

Find out now by reading a rough draft edition of The "Born Gay" Hoax!

Ryan Sorba's Book, The Born Gay Hoax

2010-12-28T14:33:00.001-08:00

The "Born Gay" Hoax is nearing completion. Until the book is finished however, feel free to browse through my older rough draft edition, free of charge.

The "Born Gay" Hoax

Stephanie Mencimer: Anti-Christian/Pro-Sodomy Activist Welcome at Mother Jones?

2010-12-28T01:33:00.000-08:00

Recently I came across a little-read Mother Jones article about my speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last Febuary. During my speech I condemned the organizers of CPAC (Re: Lisa De Pasquale and David Keene) for allowing an anti-Christian/pro-sodomy organization called "GOProud" to attend despite the fact that they are not conservative. The organization is led by Grover Norquist of American's for Tax Reform and Jimmy LeSalvia.

The Mother Jones hit piece posing as an article is insolent and cheeky. Written by journo-activist Stephanie Mencimer, the article begins with a misquote:

"He (Ryan Sorba) made some incoherrant comments about how civil rights -is- grounded in natural rights."

Here, Miss Mencimer trades my "are" for an "is" in a feeble attempt to make my statement read as though it were "incoherrant." But Mencimer's typo aside, was my statement "incoherrant?" Really?

First of all, civil rights are grounded in natural rights. If you don't believe me, just ask Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He'll tell it to you in black and white script in his Letter from a Bermingham Jail. Dr. King writes that:

"An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law..."

There you have it, Miss Mencimer. Now, allow me to repeat what I said and set the record straight (no pun intended).

"Civil rights are grounded in natural rights. Natural rights are grounded in human nature. Human nature is a rational substance in relationship. The intelligible (aka rational) end of the reproductive act is reproduction..." The secondary end of the reproductive act is spousal unity in the interest of the twenty year process of education required by the child produced. Together, reproduction and unity in the interest of education comrise the essence of marriage.

Advocates of the GOProud Agenda would have us base the essence of marriage on "mutual affection and commitment." This may sound good at first but basing marriage on affection and commitment would allow anyone to marry! Just think, if grandpa and grandson share affection and commitment they could be married! So could brother and sister. Based on the "gay" version of the essence of marriage one thousand people could be married, provided that they all share mutual affection and commitment to each other and there is no principle in the left-wing version of the essence of marriage that would allow us to reasonably restrict it. This is rediculous on its face. Shame on Mother Jones, GOProud, and the euphemistically titled grandaddy of em all, the "Human 'Rights' Campaign" for promoting such intellectual non-sense. You all get an "F" in logic, as far as I'm concerned.

This, Miss Mencimore, is not "incoherrant." Your article for Mother Jones is third-grade, "incoherrant," and to be honest, offensive. Please refrain from using chicanary and lies in your next piece. It doesn't look good on you. Please also send Mother Jones herself the following personal message for me, will you?

Dear Mother Jones,

Enough with the pop up ads already! Rediculous.

All the best,

Ryan

Ryan Sorba Bodyboarding

2010-10-13T00:54:00.000-07:00

Ryan Sorba

2010-09-14T20:39:00.000-07:00

Ryan Sorba at Sandy's Beach Oahu, where the waves are big every single day.

Ryan Sorba

2010-09-14T20:30:00.000-07:00

Ryan Sorba Snorkels

Ryan Sorba

2010-09-14T20:24:00.000-07:00

Ryan Sorba, The Wedge, 2009

Ryan Sorba

2010-09-14T20:17:00.000-07:00

Ryan Sorba Parasails in Paradise

Ryan Sorba

2010-09-05T09:15:00.000-07:00

Ryan Sorba -Honors Program, Quebec

Ryan Sorba

2010-08-16T16:32:00.002-07:00

Ryan Sorba

2010-08-16T16:32:00.001-07:00

Ryan Sorba

2010-08-16T16:31:00.002-07:00

Ryan Sorba

2010-08-16T16:31:00.001-07:00

Ryan Sorba

2010-08-16T16:30:00.001-07:00

Truth Academy: A Huge Success!

2010-08-11T18:11:00.000-07:00

August 5 -7 Pete LeBarbera's American's for Truth hosted the inaugural Truth Academy. The conference was a huge success. There were over one hundred attendees over the course of the weekend.

Speakers included Sandy Rios, former President of the Concerned for America, Robert Knight of Coral Ridge Ministries, Matt Barber and Rena Lindevaldsen of Liberty University's not-for-profit law firm Liberty Council, Cliff Kinkaid from Accuracy in Media, Ryan Sorba, Chairman of the California Young American's for Freedom, Professor Rob Gagnon, Greg Quinlan -an ex-"gay" and director of PFOX. Arthur Goldberg and Luarie Higgins were also in attendence.

The information exchanged at the event was invaluable. Cliff Kinkaid's presentations were particularly relevent to the current Don't Ask Don't Tell debate. Cliff noted that men who have sex with men are currently forbidden from giving blood, do to astronomically high rates of sexually transmitted disease infections. In the military, soldiers are expected to be ready to give blood in emergency situations for their fellow soldiers. If a fellow soldier regularly engages in sodomy however, he may infect his fellow soldier in need.

Ryan Sorba added to Cliff's case by noting that many psychiatrists and psychologists in the American Psychiatric Association understand "Homosexuality" to be psychologically disordered. "The debate is still raging in the APA," Sorba said. If "Homosexuality" is a psychological disorder it may be grounds for denial of service.

Matt Barber added that males and females are rightfully segregated in sleeping quarters due to their sexuality. If males and females are seperated then should't the "gay" males be seperated as well, epsecially when showering.

Overall, the weekend was a huge success. There is already interest in a Truth Academy in Oklahoma as well as Ohio. The Academy is meant to teach young people and other pro-family Americans how to effectively counter the propaganda of the modern pro-sodomy movement.

(this article is still under construction)

Bob Shwartz and Homosexual Hate Group Gay Liberation Network to Protest Truth Academy

2010-07-27T14:28:00.000-07:00

The anti-Christian and neo-pagan pro-sodomy hate group, "Gay Liberation Network" (GLN) — whose co-leader Bob Schwartz celebrated the University of Illinois’ recent firing of Catholic professor Kenneth Howell for his Natural Law defense of marriage– has announced that it will protest the AFTAH Truth Academy, which will be held Aug. 5-7 at the Christian Liberty Academy in Arlington Heights, Illinois.

GLN is a Marxist-oriented street protest group that attempts to equate Judeo-Christian opposition to homosexuality and capitalism with “hate” — and which uses its protests to intimidate businesses from hosting pro-family events. For its extreme anti–Christian and anti-capitalist bigotry and hateful rhetoric — including vicious ad hominem attacks against the family (e.g., calling pro-family missionary Peter LaBarbera “Satan’s Lover”) – GLN has been declared a hate organization.

GLN, formerly the Chicago Anti-Bashing Network, once smeared the historic Moody Church in Chicago as a “House of Hate” because Moody’s revered pastor, Erwin Lutzer, wrote a book critical of “same-sex marriage.”

GLN has repeatedly pilloried Chicago’s Catholic leaker Cardinal Francis George with a similar accusations because George defends Catholic teachings on sex and marriage.

Beyond that, Schwartz once told LaBarbera — who was protesting a “gay youth” rally in downtown Chicago as then-executive director of Illinois Family Institute – that if it weren’t for the police standing nearby, he would push him into the busy street. (Schwartz has never denied making this comment after it was reported by IFI.) What hatred Bob Schwartz has in his heart for Christian's who only seek to help folks overcome self-destructive sexual addictions.

LaBarbera maintains that had such a veiled violent threat been made against a homosexual by a conservative or Christian, it could have been the basis for a criminal charge under Chicago’s "hate crime" law.

Here is an excerpt of GLN’s ludicrous attempt to distort the Truth Academny’s true purpose:

Teaching young people to revere biblical teachings on marriage and God’s natural design for the family — and how to answer GLBT misinformation in the public square – is a public good.

However, GLN’s vicious name-calling and ugly smears of conservatives and pro-family libertarians as “haters” — and its regular lies about religious leaders who oppose homosexual practice – is a form of neo-Nero-ean, anti-Christian bigotry. This kind of radical intolerance by extreme sexoholics and homosexual activists must be resisted at every turn by all pro-family Americans!

David Horowitz Dumps Alex Knepper from NewsReal

2010-07-08T22:34:00.001-07:00

Today, July 8, 2010 another anti-Christian homosexual man, Alex Knepper came out of the closet as a pro-pederasty activist.

Knepper previously identified himself as a "conservative" and wrote for David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog.

After learning of Knepper's advocacy for pederasty Horowitz promptly removed him as a contributor.

Alex Knepper published an article about me online a few months back on Andrew Sullivan's blog. Andrew Sullivan it should be noted is also a sexual deviant -his life revolves around making public the fact that he engages in sodomy with other males. Due to his deviant lifestyle, sadly, he has been infected with HIV.

In the article Knepper published he inacurately recalls a brief argument I had with him for a few minutes at CPAC 2010.

The argument was about marriage. Knepper claimed that the essence of marriage consists in "shared values" and "mutual mcommitment." Under this definition however, marriage could mean almost anything. A grandmother and grandson could marry under this definition, for example. There is no principle to deny it, logically. The essence of marriage is reproduction and unity in the interest of raising children. Love, mutual help, and sexuality are secondary.

I tried illustrating these simple deductions to Knepper, but he wouldn't listen. His addiction to the chemicals released by his brain from sexual stimulation wouldn't allow him to think like a human being.

Instead he reacted like a meat puppet, controlled by strings pulled by chemical reactions in his brain -he told the nice girl I was walking with to engage in a public sex act.

Alex Knepper, a student from American University, should be known online for who he is -which is why I am writing this post. Hopefully potential future victims (organizations he submits his resume to) google his name, read this, and avoid the same mistake David Horowitz made.

In case you still have doubts about him, he recently confirmed his status as a creep obsessed with wierd and perverted sex acts when he told a reporter the following:

"For my pro-sex views, I am variously called a misogynist, a rape apologist and -- my personal favorite -- a "pro-date rape protofascist."

I don't know how Knepper slipped through the cracks at NewsReal. Perhaps it is because the website's Editor David Swindle is a pro-sodomy activist himself, obviously lacking in discernmet.

Alex Knepper is not the only left-wing hack blogging at NewsReal, however. Ryan Mauro, David Swindle, and Jesse Hathaway are also deviants, albeit to a lesser degree. While these do not advocate for pederasty they do advocate for same-sex sodomy and rail against both Christian morality and public recognition for the natural supremacy of civilized marital-based sexuality.

Hopefully NewsReal Editor-in-Chief David Horowitz will come to his senses soon and remove these deviants from NewsReal. I left a message with his office today, but have not recieved a call back.

I'll try again tomorrow.

Mariana Van Zeller: Journalist or Activist?

2010-05-22T09:01:00.000-07:00

Mariana Von Zeller recently composed a hit piece dressed up as a documentary about anti-sodomy laws in Uganda. She used the piece to attack pro-family Christian Pastor Scott Lively PhD, JD, ThD. Dr. Lively writes the following:

"Friends, burn me once, shame on you, burn me twice, shame on me. Well, shame on me for taking another liberal "journalist" at her word to accurately represent me in an interview."

Pro-sodomy activist Mariana van Zeller's recently released propaganda film is actually designed to demonize Christians and glorify sodomy.

?The film, is deceptive to its core and is falsely titled, "The American Architects of Uganda's Anti-Gay Bill" writes Joseph Cox - pro-family activist from California's Central Valley.

Going forward, young conservatives must find a way to actively expose and differentiate between real journalists, in search of the truth and activists only interested in demonizing their political opponanants.

If you are looking for the facts about Dr. Lively's work in Uganda please visit DefendtheFamily.com and look under the title "Uganda." There are about 20 stories going back to about 2003 which show the growing problem of pro-sodomy activism in that country.

You may also download Scott's new book, Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda free -the source of all of Scott's comments and teachings in Uganda.

2010-05-17T11:02:00.000-07:00

The Thesis of Capitalism by Ryan Sorba

2010-04-06T14:36:00.000-07:00

Over the course of the last century, the government of the United States has been progressively abandoning the road of economic freedom, without which, personal and political freedom, have never existed in the past.

Though we have been warned by some of the greatest political thinkers of the 19th century, like De Tocqueville and Lord Acton, that socialism means slavery, and that the, "free market is the only mechanism that has ever been discovered for achieving participatory democracy," our President and Congress have failed to understand and to take this fact, upon which our liberty stands, into account.

A few months ago, the federal government owned or controlled businesses that generate about one-third of all U.S. economic activity…numerous banks, the largest insurance company in the United States—A.I.G., Freddie Mac and Fannie May. Today the Federal Government owns over 50 percent of all home mortgages and the entire direct student loan industry. They control General Motors.

Now, with the passage of the health care bill, which makes up about 18 percent of the total U.S. economy, the government’s total involvement in the private sector is more than 50 percent.

How gradually, and by almost imperceptible steps have we been desensitized to the process by which the government is seizing control of our lives? The water is boiling, and yet we, the frogs, are still unwilling to leap, and what, at every stage of this process has appeared to us a mere difference of degree has now in its cumulative effect brought about a substantial transformation in our national spirit.

This transformation is highlighted starkly by the indifferent attitude of so many today regarding government control. Many of our fellow Americans are now eager to exchange their own liberty for a government hand out, because they have never experienced what it is really like to be the successful master of their own destiny. How could they have? Government intrusion makes it so difficult and complex to be successful in business these days that it takes a practical entrepreneurial superman to hurdle their many road blocks and for a lifetime.

Nevertheless, the change that has occurred in those willing to trade their liberty for a handout amounts to a complete reversal and entire abandonment of the do-it-yourself tradition which has over the centuries led to the independence and even dominance of Western Civilization.

A specter is haunting the United States...the specter of socialism, the chief enemy of liberty in the world today.

The chief defender of liberty in the world today…is called representative democracy, properly defined.

As noted by Austrian economist F.A. Hayek, "Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom. Socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man. Socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number." Democracy and socialism have nothing in common…except two words: equality and freedom.

But notice the differences!

While democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in servitude. The error of the socialist lays not in the fact that he values equality, but rather that he misunderstands it. He thinks socialistic equality will bring about a “new kind of freedom.” He thinks this because his predecessors have succeeded in subtly changing the meaning of the word, freedom. They did it because they know man’s craving for freedom, is the strongest of all his political motives. But the socialists “freedom” is a false prophet. A wolf, in sheep’s clothing.

To all the great apostles of true political freedom, the word has always meant freedom from coercion, freedom from the arbitrary power of other men, release from the ties that leave a man no choice but obedience to the orders of a superior to whom he was legally attached. The socialist’s freedom, however, in the words of Hayek, "was to be a 'freedom from necessity,' release from the compulsion of the circumstances which inevitably limit the range of choice for all of us. Freedom in this sense, of course, is merely another name for 'power,' or 'wealth.' The socialist confuses 'freedom' with 'power,' he confuses liberty for the 'effective power to do specific things.'” Today, there can be no doubt that the promise of greater freedom has become one of the most effective weapons of socialist propaganda, but the height of the tragedy lies in the fact that government programs mean a retreat from freedom, to a coercive organization of affairs, to collectivism, and a coercive classless society. Though the socialist promises himself a more abundant life, in practice he becomes a slave……and, indeed……right now we are seeing a new form of slavery, rising, gradually, and by almost imperceptible steps, before our very eyes.

What then, is our course?

Must liberty parish?

Is this how freedom dies, withering away, in a quiet, deadening accommodation with the weeds of totalitarian evil?

This great nation asks for action, and action now. Action is imperative if America is to survive as a free nation. F.A. Hayek once remarked that, “The battle for freedom must be won over and over again…” Pre-eminent conservative historian George H. Nash later added that, “each new struggle will be decided in the minds of the rising generation—and within that generation, substantially, by the minority who have the gift of reason, the groping, soon to be masters of society.”

From this perspective then, one path that leads to victory over socialism seems clear……and that path runs right through the hearts and minds of the rising generation…“The Reagan Generation!” those born roughly between 1976 and 1992.

Ronald Reagan defeated communism. Now it is up to “Reagan’s Children” to defeat communism’s ugly step son……socialism...

In the further words of Hayek, "The socialists in all parties……must now be either persuaded or defeated, if they and we are to remain free men."

If you are a member of the “Reagan Generation,” get active, and get extreme. Don't be afraid. Barry Goldwater once wrote that, “extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; and moderation in pursuit of justice…is no virtue.” In the words of Bill Buckley, “Stand athwart history,” all alone if you must, and in a room full of those who you may have once thought to be your closest allies, and yell, “Stop!” It is for their own good. Begin on your College Campus...and end in Congress. Push back the socialists and their allies wherever they exist, all the way there.

To some generations much is given. Of other generations, much is expected. The Reagan Generation has a rendezvous with destiny…and while our path is uncertain our final outcome has been made clear by history……

The fall of the Berlin Wall, the collapse of Communism behind the Iron Curtain, and the changing character of China, are each a testament to what our final outcome too…shall be. Socialism, like communism, is a failure. Capitalism, a success.

Did West and East Germany not provide us with an almost perfectly controlled scientific experiment? In the Middle East, Israel and Egypt offer the same contrast. These are but a few of the remarkable and dramatic confirmations of the, Thesis of Capitalism.

234 years ago our fathers, by way of revolution, brought forth upon this continent a new nation…conceived in liberty… in the revolutionary belief that our liberty comes not from the generosity of the state……but from the hands of God……We dare not forget that we are the heirs of that revolution. In the words of J.F.K., "We dare not witness or permit the slow undoing of that liberty, to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today."

New YCC Banner

2009-09-11T14:05:00.000-07:00

Obama's Crazy Green jobs Czar

2009-09-03T12:39:00.000-07:00

Foxnews.com has just reported:
Fox News Article

"President Obama's 'green jobs' adviser could become a mounting liability for the Obama administration, as the latest revelation about Van Jones shows his belief that the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks could have been an inside job. Jones joined the "9/11 truther" movement by signing a statement in 2004 calling for then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and others to launch an investigation into evidence that suggests "people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war." 'The statement asked a series of critical questions hinting at Bush administration involvement in the attacks and called for "deeper inquiry." It was also signed by former Rep. Cynthia McKinney and Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans."

This is who Obama surrounds himself with in his administration? More evidence that Obama is a left wing radical, surrounding himself with Anti-American loons.

Pic for Internet Update

2009-08-11T12:16:00.000-07:00

Ryan Sorba

2009-06-14T14:51:00.000-07:00

Ryan Sorba

2009-06-07T18:01:00.000-07:00

YCC Update

2009-06-05T17:22:00.000-07:00

1) Conservative Rap Song
2) ISI is Hiring!
3) FreedomWorks is Hiring!
4 Karl Rove will be in Dana Point
-------------------------------------------------------------

'Young Conservative Anthem' Causes Internet Buzz
A viral video on conservative values, produced by two college students, is a hit on YouTube.
By Tatiana Cooke
Uwire
Monday, June 01, 2009

An Internet rap video that claims to reflect true conservative values is quickly becoming a cult success.

"The Young Con Anthem," created by two Dartmouth students, has received more than 115,000 views and has been featured on The Huffington Post, USA Today and a variety of blogs across the political spectrum. You can view it on the Leadership Institute's campus blog: http://www.thecampusright.com/

--------------------------------------------------------------

ISI seeks motivated, knowledgeable people to join its staff. For fifty years, ISI has been working to assist American college youth in articulating the principles of a free and virtuous society. Many individuals who participated in ISI's programs or are familiar with its publications have gone on to work for the Institute. While this experience is a valuable asset for any prospective ISI employee, it is not a requirement for employment consideration.
Program Officer — Collegiate Network
5/6/09
Regional Ambassador — Intercollegiate Studies Institute
5/6/09
Résumés are accepted for possible consideration in future openings. Materials can be submitted to ISI in one of three ways.
Email: info@isi.org
(Please include "Position Inquiry" and your name in the subject line of the email.)
Fax: (302) 652-1760 Attn: Human Resources
Mail: Human Resources
Intercollegiate Studies Institute
3901 Centerville Road
Wilmington, DE 19807-1938

FreedomWorks.org is hiring!

The Interactive Media Coordinator will assist with updates to homepage, blog, and state homepages. Responsibilities will include active outreach and marketing to online forums and blogs. The position will work closely with FreedomWorks campaigns, policy, and state staff.

The ideal applicant will have experience in online media, especially conservative blogging. Candidates must be able to market FreedomWorks.org and our issues to our members and across social media platforms to drive traffic and convert visitors into activists.

Requires bachelor's degree in related field with excellent writing skills, and the ability and desire to blog and post content to the web site. Interest and understanding of free market politics and economics essential.

Ideal candidate will have basic knowledge of Drupal and WordPress. Experience with video and basic graphic design ideal.

Please forward cover letter, résumé and salary history to: Judy Mulcahy at jmulcahy@freedomworks.org

Karl Rove at the Ritz in Dana Point!

The Heritage Foundation is hosting an event with Karl Rove at the Ritz-Carlton in Laguna Niguel on June 23rd. It includes dinner and is only $60 for non-members, a really great price at the Ritz for a great speaker! Please let me know if you are interested and I will send you the registration form.

Anti-Christian Hate-Group Leader Mark Potok Attacks

2009-04-26T21:22:00.000-07:00

DefendTheFamily.com Alert

Open letter to several leaders of the Southern Poverty Law Center

Mark Potok,

You told The Californian newspaper that to be removed from your list of hate groups I would need to repudiate my book The Pink Swastika. I won't, but in fairness you should add others who make some of the same claims.

The author of a recent article in The Huffington Post writes "With the exception of Jean-Marie Le Pen, all the most high-profile fascists in Europe in the past thirty years have been gay." Not even The Pink Swastika made this assertion, and there's much more in this article. Surely you will not allow this man to get away with such outrageous statements. I insist that you add him to your "hate" list.

Read it for yourself:

www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-strange-strange-story_b_136697.html

Sincerely,

Pastor Scott Lively, J.D., Th.D.
President, Abiding Truth Ministries

PS. I have not yet received an response to my last e-mail asking why you haven't listed Perez Hilton as a hater for his public denigration and abuse of Christian Miss USA contestant Carrie Prejean for her religious views on marriage.

Johann Hari
The Strange, Strange Story of the Gay Fascists
Posted October 21, 2008, The Huffington Post

The news that Jorg Haider - the Austrian fascist leader - spent his final few hours in a gay bar with a hot blond has shocked some people. It hasn't shocked me. This is a taboo topic for a gay left-wing man like me to touch, but there has always been a weird, disproportionate overlap between homosexuality and fascism. Take a deep breath; here goes.

Some 10,000 gay people were slaughtered in the Nazi death-camps. Many more were humiliated, jailed, deported, ethnically cleansed, or castrated. One gay survivor of the camps, LD Classen von Neudegg, has written about his experiences. A snapshot: "Three men had tried to escape one night. They were captured, and when they returned they had the word 'homo' scrawled across their clothing. They were placed on a block and whipped. Then they were forced to beat a drum and cheer, 'Hurrah! We're back! Hurrah!' Then they were hanged." This is one of the milder events documented in his book.

So the idea of a gay fascist seems ridiculous. Yet when the British National Party - our own home-grown Holocaust-denying bigots - announced it was fielding an openly gay candidate in the European elections this June, dedicated followers of fascism didn't blink. The twisted truth is that gay men have been at the heart of every major fascist movement that ever was - including the gay-gassing, homo-cidal Third Reich. With the exception of Jean-Marie Le Pen, all the most high-profile fascists in Europe in the past thirty years have been gay. It's time to admit something. Fascism isn't something that happens out there, a nasty habit acquired by the straight boys. It is - in part, at least - a gay thing, and it's time for non-fascist gay people to wake up and face the marching music.

Just look at our own continent over the past decade. Dutch fascist Pim Fortuyn ran on blatantly racist anti-immigrant platform, describing Islam as "a cancer" and "the biggest threat to Western civilisation today." Yet with two little fluffy dogs and a Mamma complex, he was openly, flamboyantly gay. When accused by a political opponent of hating Arabs, he replied, "How can I hate Arabs? I sucked one off last night."

Jorg Haider blasted Austria's cosy post-Nazi politics to rubble in 2000 when his neo-fascist 'Freedom Party' won a quarter of the vote and joined the country's government as a coalition partner. Several facts always cropped up in the international press coverage: his square jaw, his muscled torso, his SS-supporting father, his rabid anti-Semitism, his hatred of immigrants, his description of Auschwitz and Dachau as "punishment centres". A few newspapers mentioned that he is always surrounded by fit, fanatical young men. A handful went further and pointed out that several of these young men are openly gay. Then one left-wing German paper broke the story everybody else was hinting at. They alleged Haider is gay.

Rumours of an Indian waiter with "intimate details" of Haider's body broke into the press. The Freedom Party's general manager Gerald Miscka quickly quit, amid accusations that he was Haider's lover. Haider's close gay friend Walter Kohler - who has been photographed showing off a holstered pistol while Haider chuckled - declared his opposition to outing politicians. Haider - who was married and has two children - kept quiet while his functionaries denied the rumours. The revelation that he died after leaving a gay bar suggests these rumours were true.

On and on it goes. If you inter-railed across Europe, only stopping with gay fascists, there aren't many sights you'd miss. France's leading post-war fascist was Edouard Pfieffer, who was not batting for the straight side. Germany's leading neo-Nazi all through the eighties was called Michael Kuhnen; he died of AIDS in 1991 a few years after coming out. Martin Lee, author of a study of European fascism, explains, "For Kuhnen, there was something supermacho about being a Nazi, as well as being a homosexual, both of which enforced his sense of living on the edge, of belonging to an elite that was destined to make an impact. He told a West German journalist that homosexuals were 'especially well-suited for our task, because they do not want ties to wife, children and family.'"

And it wouldn't be long before your whistlestop tour arrived in Britain. At first glance, our Nazis seem militantly straight. They have tried to disrupt gay parades, describe gay people as "evil", and BNP leader Nick Griffin reacted charmingly to the bombing of the Admiral Duncan pub in 1999 with a column saying, "The TV footage of gay demonstrators [outside the scene of carnage] flaunting their perversion in front of the world's journalists showed just why so many ordinary people find these creatures repulsive."

But scratch to homophobic surface and there's a spandex swastika underneath. In 1999, Martin Webster, a former National Front organiser and head honcho in the British fascist movement, wrote a four-page pamphlet detailing his 'affair' with Nick Griffin. "Griffin sought out intimate relations with me," openly-gay Webster explained, "in the late 1970s. He was twenty years younger than me." Ray Hill, who infiltrated the British fascist movement for twelve years to gather information for anti-fascist groups, says it's all too plausible. Homosexuality is "extremely prevalent" in the upper echelons of the British far right, and at one stage in the 1980s nearly half of the movement's organisers were gay, he claims.

Gerry Gable, editor of the anti-fascist magazine 'Searchlight', explains, "I have looked at Britain's Nazi groups for decades and this homophobic hypocrisy has been there all the time. I cannot think of any organisation on the extreme right that hasn't attacked people on the grounds of their sexual preference and at the same time contained many gay officers and activists."

Griffins' alleged gay affair would stand in a long British fascist tradition. The leader of the skinhead movement all through the 1970s was a crazed, muscled thug called Nicky Crane. He was the icon of a reactionary backlash against immigrants, feminism and the 'hippy' lifetsyle of the 1960s. His movement's emphasis on conformity to a shaven, dehumanised norm resembled classical fascist movements; Crane soon became a campaigner and leading figure in the National Front. Oh, and he was gay. Before he died of AIDS in the mid-1980s, Crane came out and admitted he had starred in many gay porn videos. Just before he died in 1986, he was allowed to steward a Gay Pride march in London, even though he still said he was "proud to be a fascist."

The rubber-soled friction between gay fascists and progressive British gay people sparked into anger in 1985 when the Gay Skinhead Movement organised a disco at London's Gay Centre. Several lesbians in particular objected to the "invasion" of the centre. They felt that the cult of "real men" and hypermasculine thugs was stirring up the most base feelings "in the very place, the gay movement, where you would least expect them."

And this Gaystapo has an icon to revere, an alternative Fuhrer to worship: the lost gay fascist leader Ernst Rohm. Along with Adolf Hitler, Rohm was the founding father of Nazism. Born to conservative Bavarian civil servants in 1887, Ernst Rohm's life began - in his view - in the "heroic" trenches of the First World War. Like so many of the generation who formed the Nazi Party, he was nurtured by and obsessed with the homoerotic myth of the trenches - heroic, beautiful boys prepared to die for their brothers and their country.

He emerged from the war with a bullet-scarred face and a reverence for war. As he put it in his autobiography, "Since I am an immature and wicked man, war and unrest appeal to me more than the good bourgeois order." After being disbanded, he tried half-heartedly to get a foothold in civilian life, but he saw it as alien, bourgeois, boring. He had no political beliefs, only prejudices - particularly hatred of Jews. Historian Joachim Fest describes Rohm's generation of alienated, demobbed young men humiliated by defeat as "agents of a permanent revolution without any revolutionary idea of the future, only a wish to eternalize the values of the trenches."

It was Rohm who first spotted the potential of a soap-box ranter called Adolf Hitler. He saw him as the demagogue he needed to mobilize support for his plan to overthrow democracy and establish a "soldier's state" where the army ruled untrammelled. He introduced the young fascist to local politicians and military leaders; they knew him for many years as "Rohm's boy." Gay historian Frank Rector notes, "Hitler was, to a substantial extent, Rohm's protégé." Rohm integrated Hitler into his underground movement to overthrow the Weimar Republic.

Rohm's blatant, out homosexuality seems bizarre now, given the gay genocide that was to follow. He talked openly about his fondness for gay bars and Turkish baths, and was known for his virility. He believed that gay people were superior to straights, and saw homosexuality as a key principle of his proposed Brave New Fascist Order. As historian Louis Snyder explains, Rohm "projected a social order in which homosexuality would be regarded as a human behaviour pattern of high repute... He flaunted his homosexuality in public and insisted his cronies do the same. He believed straight people weren't as adept at bullying and aggression as homosexuals, so homosexuality was given a high premium in the SA." They promoted an aggressive, hypermasculine form of homosexuality, condemning "hysterical women of both sexes", in reference to feminine gay men.

This belief in the superiority of homosexuality had a strong German tradition that grew up at the turn of the twentieth century around Adolf Brand, publisher of the country's first gay magazine. You could call it 'Queer as Volk': they preached that gay men were the foundation of all nation-states and represented an elite, warrior caste that should rule. They venerated the ancient warrior cults of Sparta, Thebes and Athens.

Rohm often referred to the ancient Greek tradition of sending gay solider couples into battle, because they were believed to be the most ferocious fighters. The famous pass of Thermopylae, for example was held by 300 soldiers - who consisted of 150 gay couples. In its early years, the SA - Hitler and Rohm's underground army - was seen as predominantly gay. Rohm assigned prominent posts to his lovers, making Edmund Heines his deputy and Karl Ernst the SA commander in Berlin. The organisation would sometimes meet in gay bars. The gay art historian Christian Isermayer said in an interview, "I got to know people in the SA. They used to throw riotous parties even in 1933... I once attended one. It was quite well-behaved but thoroughly gay. But then, in those days, the SA was ultra-gay."

On June 30th 1934, Rohm was awoken in a Berlin hotel by Hitler himself. He sprang to his feet and saluted, calling, "Heil Mein Fuhrer!" Hitler said simply, "You are under arrest," and with that he left the room, giving orders for Rohm to be taken to Standelheim prison. He was shot that night. Rohm was the most high-profile kill in the massacre known as 'the Night of the Long Knives'.

Rohm had been suspected by Hitler of disloyalty, but his murder began a massive crackdown on gay people. Heinrich Himmler, head of the Gestapo, described homosexuality as "a symptom of degeneracy that could destroy our race. We must return to the guiding Nordic principle: extermination of degenerates."

German historian Lothar Machtan argues that Hitler had Rohm - and almost all of the large number of gay figures within the SA - killed to silence speculation about his own homosexual experiences. His 'evidence' for Hitler being gay is shaky and has been questioned by many historians, although some of his findings are at least suggestive. A close friend of Hitler's during his teenager years, August Kubizek, alleged a "romantic" affair between them. Hans Mend, a despatch rider who served alongside Hitler in the First World War, claimed to have seen Hitler having sex with a man. Hitler was certainly very close to several gay men, and never seems to have had a normal sexual relationship with a woman, not even his wife, Eva Braun.

Rudolph Diels, the founder of the Gestapo, recorded some of Hitler's private thoughts on homosexuality. "It had destroyed ancient Greece, he said. Once rife, it extended its contagious effects like an ineluctable law of nature to the best and most manly of characters, eliminating from the breeding pool the very men the Volk most needs." This idea - that homosexuality is 'contagious' and, implicitly, tempting - is revealing.

Rohm is venerated on the Homo-Nazi sites that have bred on the internet like germs in a wound. They have names like Gays Against Semitism (with the charming acronym GAS), and the Aryan Resistance Corps (ARC). Their Rohmite philosophy is simple: while white men are superior to other races, gay men are "the masters of the Master Race". They alone are endowed with the "capacity for pure male bonding" and the "superior intellect" that is needed for "a fascist revolution." The ARC even organises holiday "get-togethers" for its members where "you can relax amongst the company of our fellow white brothers."

So it's fairly easy to establish that gay people are not inoculated from fascism. They have often been at its heart. This begs the bigger question: why? How did gay people - so often victims of oppression and hate - become integral to the most hateful and evil political movement of all? Is it just an extreme form of self-harm, the political equivalent to the gay kids who slash their own arms to ribbons out of self-hate?

Gay pornographer and film-maker Bruce LaBruce has one explanation. He claims that "all gay porn today is implictly fascist. Fascism is in our bones, because it's all about glorifying white male supremacy and fetishizing domination, cruelty, power and monstrous authority figures." He has tried to explore the relationship between homosexuality and fascism in his movies, beginning with 'No Skin Off My Ass' in 1991. In his disturbing 1999 film "Skin Flick', a bourgeois gay couple - one black, one white - are sexually terrorised by a gang of gay skinheads who beat off to 'Mein Kampf' and beat up 'femmes'. He implies that bourgeois gay norms quickly break down to reveal a fascist lurking underneath; the movie ends with the black character being raped in front of his half-aroused white lover, as the racist gang chant, "Fuck the monkey."

I decided to track down some gay fascists and ask them directly. Wyatt Powers, director of the ARC, says, "I always knew in my heart racist and gay were both morally right. I don't see any conflict between them. It's only the Jew-owned gay press that tries to convince us that racialism is the same thing as homophobia. You can be an extreme nationalist and gay without any contradiction at all."

One comment board on a gay racist website goes even further into racist lunacy. One gay man from Ohio says, "Even if you are gay and white, or retarded and white, YOU ARE WHITE, BOTTOM LINE! Instead of letting the white race go extinct because of worthless races such as the Africans or Mexicans popping out literally millions of babies a day, we have to fight this fucked up shit they are doing. They are raping our country." It's true that racism and homophobia do not necessarily overlap - but as Rabbi Bernard Melchman explains, "Homophobia and anti-Semitism are so often part of the same disease." Racists are usually homophobic. Even after reading all their web rantings, I didn't feel any closer to understanding why so many gay men ally themselves with people who will almost always turn on them in the end, just as the Nazis did.

Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell has a sensitive and intriguing explanation. "There are many reasons for this kind of thing," he says. "Some of them are in denial. They are going for hyper-masculinity, the most extreme possible way of being a man. It's a way of ostentatiously rejecting the perceived effeminacy of the homosexual 'Other'. These troubled men have a simple belief in their minds: 'Straight men are tough. Queers are weak. Therefore if I'm tough I can't be queer.' It's a desperate way of proving their manhood."

'Searchlight' magazine - the bible of the British anti-fascist movement, with moles in every major far-right organisation - offers an alternative explanation. "Generally condemned by a society that continues to be largely hostile to gays, some men may find refuge and a new power status in the far right," one of their writers has explained. "Through adherence to the politics espoused by fascist groups, a new identity emerges - one where they aren't outcasts, because they are White Men, superior to everyone else. They render the gay part of their identity invisible - or reject the socially less acceptable parts, like being feminine - while vaunting what they see as superior."

But there's another important question: will fascist movements inevitably turn on gay people? In the case of the Nazis, it seems to have been fairly arbitrary; Hitler's main reason for killing Rohm was unrelated to his sexuality. From my perspective as a progressive-minded leftie, all fascism is evil; but should all gay people see it as inimical to their interests? Is it possible to have a gay fascist who wasn't acting against his own interests? Fascism is often defined as "a political ideology advocating hierarchical government that systematically denies equality to certain groups." It's true that this hierarchy could benefit gay people at the expense of, say, black people. But given the prevalence of homophobia, isn't that - even for people who don't see fascism as inherently evil - a terrible risk to take? Won't a culture that turns viciously on one minority get around to gay people in the end? This seems, ultimately, to be the lesson of Ernst Rohm's pitiful, squalid litt! le life.

The growing awareness of the role gay men play in fascist movements has been abused by some homophobes. In an especially nutty work of revisionist history called 'The Pink Swastika', the 'historian' Scott Lively tries to blame gay people for the entire Holocaust, and describes the murder of gay men in the camps as merely "gay-on-gay violence." A typical website commenting on the book claims absurdly, "The Pink Swastika shows that there was far more brutality, rape, torture and murder committed against innocent people by Nazi homosexuals than there even was against homosexuals themselves."

Yet we can't allow these madmen to prevent a period of serious self-reflection from the gay movement. If Bruce LaBruce is right, many of the mainstream elements of gay culture - body worship, the lauding of the strong, a fetish for authority figures and cruelty - provide a swamp in which the fascist virus can thrive. Do some gay people really still need to learn that fascists will not bring on a Fabulous Solution for gay people, but a Final Solution for us all?

###

[Ed. He's a little off-base on some of the facts re Roehm's assasination (the assassins were also "gay"), and he takes the obligatory swipe at The Pink Swastika (which he obviously used as a jumping off point for his own research) but all-in-all I'd say he's done an excellent job confirming a major pillar of Abram's and my thesis.]

Obama and "Torture"

2009-04-22T12:37:00.000-07:00

From http://www.samspolitics.com/
President Obama recently ordered the CIA and the Justice Dept. to release memos outlining the exact interrogation techniques American operatives used to extract information from known terrorists. Some of these methods include water boarding, sleep deprivation and scare tactics involving bugs. These are the techniques that the President has termed "torture," and has outlawed, even though these techniques were incredibly effective in gaining valuable intelligence and preventing further terrorist attacks. In short, these techniques literally helped save American lives. President Obama and other hysteric liberals inaccurately call these effective techniques "torture." Ask John Mccain and he'll tell you about torture, or watch a youtube video of Islamofascists decapitating Daniel Pearls head, and you'll get a better understanding of what torture really is.
President Obama and other liberals self righteously state that America is above "torture" and that we cannot compromise our values in our fight against terrorism. Really? Basically, the President is saying that if it were known that a captured terrorist had information about an impending attack, we would not put a scary bug in his cell to compel him to speak in order to uphold our "values." What a bunch of BS. What about the American value of stopping Americans from being incinerated to death, or crashed into buildings on 747s? This morning the President stated that protecting Americans is his number one priority. If this were the case then the President would not mind violating the rights of known terrorists, with the blood of American citizens on their hands, in order to prevent future attacks. It is clear that the President is putting the rights and well being of terrorists over that of Americans.

TEA Party Tactics: Should You Encounter Leftist Infiltrators

2009-04-13T23:23:00.000-07:00

As many of you know, the April 15th tax payer revolt is brewing. TEA Parties ("T axed E nough A lready") are going to take place all over the nation.

In case you are new to the world of protests, here are a number of tactics that you may want to employ, should you encounter ACORN
plants and other leftist infiltrators.

First, create a number of "INFILTRATOR" signs to point out any plants and identify them as not a part of the Tea Party. Some left-wing blogs have suggested that infiltrators utilize racist and other derogatory messages to make it look like the Tea Party protesters are "intolerant bigots." This is where the "INFILTRATOR" and "ACORN PLANT" signs come in to use.

Also, please spread the work to ensure that as many people as possible bring along digital cameras and DVR cameras. People tend to behave and act civil when there are cameras around to record their actions. If some infiltrators become verbally abusive and physically belligerent, tell them they are being recorded and that the video will be downloaded onto YouTube, and if necessary, forwarded to the authorities.

Some of these internet blog threats and rumors may be just that, threats and rumors but nothing else. However, it is important that we be prepared. I'll see you all out there, in a field and on t.v.

Viva la conservative revolucion,

Rick Reiss
MTRA, Programs Director

Brendan Steinhauser
FreedomWorks, Director of State and Federal Campaigns

Ryan Sorba
YCC, Chairman

Obama is Misleading the American People

2009-03-30T16:04:00.000-07:00

From http://www.samspolitics.com/
President Obama is being extremely misleading when he states that his plans to reform healthcare, energy and education are essential in order to jumpstart our economy. This is simply not true as education, healthcare and energy have very little to do with this economic crisis. The economic crisis is centered in the financial sector and the housing market. The reason for the housing crisis, by the way, is because for years liberal in congress have been coercing banks to make loans to unqualified borrowers, because of a misguided liberal compassionate notion that everybody should own a home. It is because of this intervention in the free market that housing collapsed. Any way, back to the point.
Obama is using this economic crisis to impose his big government ideology on the American people, in a way that has no connection with the economic crisis. Now, legislating Universal healthcare may be good policy, if one believes in socialized medicine (which I do not), however, healthcare costs have nothing to do with our economic troubles. And even if they did, how would insuring another thirty or so million Americans make healthcare cheaper? It makes absolutely no sense. Like I said, it may be good compassionate policy, but it will not help our economy in the slightest.
The same can be said for education. Vastly increasing the money we spend on public education may good policy, but it will not jumpstart our economy. Perhaps in twenty years this may help our economy, but for now the President should be focused on getting our economy out of the gutter, a very difficult task, that has little to do with education. And if the President were so concerned with education he would legislate the voucher program, wherein parents choose what schools their children go to, increasing competition and quality of education.
The President has also said that an energy overhaul is needed to help our economy. Well, this may be true, but his strategy has nothing to do with making energy cheaper; in fact, his policy proposals will do the exact opposite. The President is proposing new energy taxes and cap and trade. These two initiatives have nothing to do with improving energy prices and everything to do with preventing global warming. Once again, preventing global warming may good public policy, but it has absolutely nothing to do with improving our economy! If the President were so concerned with energy prices he would advocate exploration into America’s vast oil fields off the coast of California and Florida, and in Alaska.

Obama Strangles Free Market

2009-03-05T16:04:00.000-08:00

From http://www.samspolitics.com/ - Today stocks plunged nearly 300 points. Since Obama took office, the Dow has lost nearly 20% of its total value. Is it possible that all the lofty expectations for President Obama were too unrealistic? President Obama has set aside $600 billion for universal healthcare, before any specific plans for it's implementation have been formulated. Is it wise to be pursuing such an ambitous, expensive and unproven agenda item, such as universal healthcare, in these troubling economic times? This is in addition to the $800 billion stimulus package, and the proposed $400 billion spending bill. The President is also planning tax increases for all those earning above 250 thousand per year; these people are also known as the "job creators." Does the President think that penalizing the main investors and employers in our society is going to help the economy? If he does he is in for an unpleasant surprise, as raising the income and capital gains taxes are going to discourage investments and entrepreneurial ingenuity. Furthermore, it is misleading for the President to state that taxes will only be increased for the affluent, as he is planning to cap greenhouse gasses, which will lead to higher energy prices and taxes for everyone in society. On top of that, the President is proposing to reduce the amount of money the rich can write off for charitable donations, which will undoubtedly have very negative consequences for charities, as the rich will not give as much. The over regulation and intervention of Obama's government is too overbearing for the free market to handle, and the Dow Jones is proof.

2009-03-02T23:49:00.001-08:00

(As seen on Samspolitics.com) The "man-made global warming leading to catastrophe" nuts were at it again in DC, protesting in the midst of a huge snow storm and freezing temperatures. Its as if G-d was trying to get a message across to these loons. The sad likelyhood is that none of these protesters even made the connection, as global warming hysteria has morphed into a religion, wherein reason and science cannot deter ones belief that global warming will destroy mankind. President Obama has joined the fight against the sun, and is proposing cap and trade, which would increase the costs of energy for all Americans.

From Fox News Article - Global warming activists stormed Washington Monday for what was billed as the nation's largest act of civil disobedience to fight climate change -- only to see the nation's capital virtually shut down by a major winter storm. Schools and businesses were shuttered, lawmakers cancelled numerous appearances and the city came to a virtual standstill as Washington was blasted with its heaviest snowfall of the winter. It spelled about six inches of trouble for global warming activists who had hoped to swarm the Capitol by the thousands in an effort to force the government to close the Capitol Power Plant, which heats and cools a number of government buildings, including the Supreme Court and the Capitol. The snowy scene, with temperatures in the mid-20s, was reminiscent of a day in January 2004, when Al Gore made a major address on global warming in New York -- on one of the coldest days in the city's history. Protest organizers said about 2,500 people braved the blizzard to oppose greenhouse gas emissions, but the shroud of snow wasn't the only wet blanket in the nation's capital Monday. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who called on the architect of the Capitol to stop burning coal at the power plant last week, cancelled her appearance at the rally because her flight to Washington was cancelled.

Buchanan on Immigration

2009-02-27T15:58:00.000-08:00

(From Samspolitics.com) Patrick Buchanan recently wrote a very informative article about how the massive flow of illegal immigration is harming America's lower class (The entire article can be found ay Humanevents.com). Buchanan makes the excellent point that millions of illegal immigrants hold jobs in the service, food and industrial sectors, that young, uneducated AMERICAN, minorities could hold. It is a myth that illegal immigrants only hold jobs that no Americans want. The liberal establishment, who fancy themselves champions of the have nots, are in fact doing a great disservice to the underclass, by not demanding that border laws be enforced.

Buchanan writes: Case in point -- rampant unemployment among minority youth. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, among African-Americans 18 to 29 with only a high-school degree, unemployment is now 20 percent. Among black adults who do not have a high-school diploma, it is 24 percent. Among teenagers under 18, black unemployment is 30 percent. Among native-born Hispanics with only a high-school diploma, the unemployment rate is 13.6 percent. Among high-school dropouts, 16 percent. Among Hispanic 16- and 17-year-olds, the jobless figure is 40 percent. As these figures were compiled in December, before the last two months of sweeping layoffs, they surely understate the situation. And with both black and Hispanic dropout rates now reaching 50 percent in major cities, the social dynamite is piling up. Last month, USA Today reported that the FBI estimates there are now 1 million gang members in the United States -- up 200,000 from 2005 -- and these gangs are responsible for 80 percent of all U.S. crimes. From other studies, young Hispanics are 19 times as likely as white youth to join gangs, while African-Americans are 15 times. These millions of teenagers, and unskilled and less-educated young adults with no jobs and little prospect of finding them, are recruiting pools for criminal gangs. Who is getting the jobs for which these native-born black and Hispanic young could quality? Illegal aliens hold literally millions of them.

Obama's Address to the Nation

2009-02-25T17:42:00.000-08:00

Although I disagree with most of the substance of his rhetoric, President Obama clearly delivered another incredible speech last night. However, this speech was nothing more than a trojan horse for a funbag of liberal goodies. The President and I share the common goal of getting America out of this economic crisis, but we fundamentally disagree on the path to take. Last night the President presented the most ambitious and expensive spending plan in the history of America. He wants to guarantee health care and a college education for everyone, as well as cap CO2 emissions. Exactly how does he plan to pay for all of this in a dreadful economy. It was comical to hear him speak about his dedication to fiscal responsibility and restraint in one breath, while touting these expensive spending programs in the next. The thing that struck me the most last night was his statement about implementing cap and trade on CO2 emissions, which would inevitably lead to the rationing of energy, a decrease in supply, and ultimately an increase in the cost of energy. During this time of economic hardship we should not be saddling businesses with further regulations, which will increase the cost of business for everyone.

Cheney Criticizes President Obama

2009-02-04T21:59:00.000-08:00

(From Samspolitics.com) In an interview with Politico.com former Vice President, Dick Cheney, criticized President Obama for not prosecuting the War on Terror as Bush did. Cheney is referring to Obama's plans to close Gitmo and prohibit the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. In addition, Cheney believes that President Obama is too concerned about America being loved around the world. Cheney makes an excellent point, as much of the world is a moral wasteland, and America should only be worried about sticking to our core values. America is the greatest country in the world because we are the only country that consistently fights evil around the world. If we start acting in a way because we want to be liked, then America will no longer be exceptional.

Cheney said:
“When we get people who are more concerned about reading the rights to an Al Qaeda terrorist than they are with protecting the United States against people who are absolutely committed to do anything they can to kill Americans, then I worry...The United States needs to be not so much loved as it needs to be respected. Sometimes, that requires us to take actions that generate controversy. I’m not at all sure that that’s what the Obama administration believes.” (For more click on link above)

The Obama Nominee Fiasco

2009-02-03T12:52:00.000-08:00

(From Samspolitics.com) Tom Daschle is the 2nd Obama cabinet nominee who did not pay his full share of taxes. As a result, Daschle has dropped out as potential Secretary of Health and Human Services, a significant position in the Obama administration, in charge of overhauling healthcare. The other was Timothy Geithner, who was just approved as Secretary of the Treasury, despite his tax problems. Obama's judgement should be called into question after these two botched nominations, because Geithner and Daschle were either too incompetent to figure out how much taxes they owed, or worse, they intentionally decieved the IRS.
This story is very ironic in two ways. First, assuming Daschle and Geithner did not intentionally withhold money, one must wonder how the Federal Government expects regular citizens to figure out how much money they owe in taxes, when the people who legislate those laws cannot figure it out themselves! The tax laws are extremely complex and outdated. In addition, it is almost comical that two members of the Democratic party did not pay tens of thousands of dollars in taxes owed to the government. After all, the Democrats are the party of higher taxes, especially for the top earners, a group which Geithner and Daschle are surely a part of, and thus when top Democratic Officials do not pay their taxes it comes off as a little hypocritical. If Geithner and Dachle do not want to pay nearly half of their income to the government, then they should lobby for lower taxes, like Republicans!

Times Reporter Philippe Naughton Disrespects Christianity

2008-12-29T21:41:00.000-08:00

In an article entitled, "Pope accused of stoking homophobia after he equates homosexuality to climate change" Times reporter Philippe Naughton disrespects Catholicism, Christianity, and all of humanity by lending legitimacy to the homofascist claim that anyone who shuns sodomy is somehow "homophobic."

Naughton starts off her article by quoting the Pope one or two measly times. She then uses the rest of her terrible article to Christian bash. In short, she places quote after painful quote of heretical occultists claiming the Holy Bible supports acts of sodomy.

Philippe Naughton ought to get off the homofascist band wagon and come back to reality. Yes, reality. That thing homofascist's find so hard to believe in. In reality, the human body is not an abstraction, but rather, an important part of who we are as human beings. We are not abstract conscious's inhabiting impersonal bodies, but rather our bodies are a part of who we are and we must recognize as much if our personhood is ever to be whole, entire, and unbroken.

Step Down! Jerry Brown!

2008-12-20T11:44:00.001-08:00

California state Attorney General Jerry Brown says that he will now defend sodomy in the California courts against the will of Californians, who voted overwhelmingly on November 4th in favor of natural marriage.

Due to "deep probing," into the issues of sodomy and same-sex attraction, Brown says, he's had a change of heart.

Get Out of Our Party RINO's!!

2008-12-03T14:07:00.000-08:00

The following so-called "Republicans" (RINO'S) supported Barack Hussein Obama Jr. for president. Please join me in excommunicating them from the Republican Party by reposting this list and/or sending it to all your Republican contacts.

Former Governor Massachusetts, William Weld.

Former Rhode Island Senator, Lincoln Chafee.

Former Governor Minnesota, Arne Carlson.

Former Governor and Senator Connecticut, Lowell Weicker.

Former Governor Virginia, Linwood Holton.

Former Governor Michigan, William Milliken.

Former South Dakota Senator, Larry Pressler.

Former Iowa Congressman, Jim Leach.

Former Maryland Congressman, Wayne Gilchrest.

Former Bush Secretary of State, Colin Powell.

Former Bush Press Secretary, Scott McClellan.

Former Reagan White House Chief of Staff, Ken Duberstein.

Former Reagan Solicitor General, Charles Fried

Former Reagan White House Counsel, Douglas Kmiec.

Former Los Angeles Mayor, Richard Riordan.

Jeffrey Hart, National Review Senior Editor

Christopher Buckley, son of the founder of National Review.

Viva la conservative revolucion,

Ryan Sorba

Cardinal Stafford criticizes Obama as ‘aggressive, disruptive and apocalyptic’

2008-11-20T00:18:00.000-08:00

Washington DC, Nov 17, 2008 / 02:27 pm (CNA).- Cardinal James Francis Stafford, head of the Apostolic Penitentiary of the Holy See, delivered a lecture on Thursday saying that the future under President-elect Obama will echo Jesus’ agony in Gethsemane. Criticizing Obama as “aggressive, disruptive and apocalyptic,” he went on to speak about a decline in respect for human life and the need for Catholics to return to the values of marriage and human dignity.

Delivered at the Catholic University of America, the cardinal’s lecture was titled “Pope Paul VI and Pope John Paul II: Being True in Body and Soul,” the student university paper The Tower reports. Hosted by the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family, his words focused upon Paul VI’s encyclical Humanae Vitae, whose fortieth anniversary is marked this year.

Commenting on the results of the recent presidential election, Cardinal Stafford said on Election Day “America suffered a cultural earthquake.” The cardinal argued that President-elect Obama had campaigned on an “extremist anti-life platform” and predicted that the near future would be a time of trial.

For more click here.

"Lesbian" Donor Gives Woman HIV Through Transplant

2008-11-18T18:40:00.001-08:00

From Chicago Breaking News--

Lawsuit: Patient got HIV-infected transplant

A transplant patient at the University of Chicago Medical Center filed suit today against the hospital and one of its surgeons, claiming she received a kidney from a donor infected with HIV and hepatitis C.

The patient, identified only as Jane Doe, alleges the hospital knew that the donor, who was homosexual, was in a high-risk group and withheld the information from her. Had she known of the "true nature of the donor's lifestyle and the risks associated with receiving his kidney" she would not have consented to the surgery, the lawsuit said.

The woman was one of four transplant recipients who contracted HIV from the donor, whose infection went undetected in what hospital officials say is the first documented case of the virus being transmitted by organ donation in the U.S. in more than 20 years.

The Tribune first reported on the infections resulting from the transplants a year ago.

Officials have not released any personal details about the donor or recipients, citing medical privacy laws. The suit was filed anonymously to protect her privacy, said her attorney, Thomas A. Demetrio.

The woman, now 33 and living in the Chicago area, was on dialysis for a condition that was not life-threatening when a transplant coordinator at the medical center notified her of an available kidney, the suit said. The kidney was transplanted on Jan. 9, 2007.

The woman was asked on Nov. 1 of that year to return to the hospital for testing because one of the other three organ recipients from the same donor had tested positive for HIV. The test determined she was infected with HIV and hepatitis C, Demetrio said.

The suit charges medical negligence for failing to notify the woman of the donor's high-risk behavior and for not testing her for HIV three months after the transplant, as recommended by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the case of high-risk donors.

The donor had not tested positive for the diseases, probably because the infections were too recent to register on the screening tests used. The University of Chicago Medical Center was one of three area hospitals that transplanted organs from the donor, who died from injuries sustained in an auto accident.

In July, the patient's body rejected the kidney. She is back on dialysis, awaiting another transplant.

-- Deborah L. Shelton

http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2008/11/transplant-patient-sues-after-getting-hiv.html

Hands Off Our Proposition!!! Religious Liberty at Stake!

2008-11-16T13:27:00.000-08:00

With Homosexual 'Marriage' Christian Freedoms Will be Under Greatest Threat in Hawaii, Wisconsin

By John-Henry Westen

WASHINGTON, November 14, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A new study by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty has found that over 350 separate state anti-discrimination laws would likely be affected by the legal recognition of same-sex “marriage.” The organization surveyed over 1,000 state anti-discrimination laws -- specifically those prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender, or marital status -- to assess how those laws would affect religious dissenters to same-sex “marriage” if same-sex “marriage” were to be legally recognized.

Based on the data, The Becket Fund concluded that if same-sex “marriage” is recognized by courts or legislatures, people and institutions that have conscientious objections to facilitating same-sex “marriages” will likely be sued under existing anti-discrimination laws, despite the fact that those laws were never intended for that purpose.

Based on an analysis of the laws and what has transpired in other jurisdictions with similar laws, such as Canada, the Becket Fund warned: "Lawsuits will likely arise when religious people or religious organizations choose, based on their sincerely held religious beliefs, not to hire individuals in same-sex marriages, refuse to extend spousal benefits to same-sex spouses, refuse to make their property or services available for same-sex marriage ceremonies or other events affirming same-sex marriage, or refuse to provide otherwise available housing to same-sex couples. This wide-ranging conflict between governments and conscientious citizens would take years of litigation to resolve, assuming that it could be resolved."

The study found that all 50 states prohibit gender discrimination in some way, and only 37 states have explicit religious exemptions to these provisions, many of them quite narrow. This lack of exemptions could become a problem if (as has happened in some instances) religious objections to same-sex “marriage” are treated as a kind of gender discrimination.

In addition, 33 states prohibit at least some discrimination based on marital status, and only 13 of these states provide religious exemptions, some with a wide latitude of exemption, others with only narrow exemptions. Of the 20 states that prohibit sexual orientation-based discrimination, 18 provide exemptions for religious objection.

Hawaii and Wisconsin are especially concerning since, while these states prohibit gender, marital status and sexual orientation-based discrimination, they have no provision for religious exemption from such laws.

"When considering same-sex marriage, both legislatures and the judiciary should recognize the competing religious liberty rights involved," suggests the Becket Fund. "If legislators or judges do recognize same-sex marriage, they should carve out robust religious exemptions for religious dissenters. Additionally, academic institutions and public interest groups should stimulate public discussion on these conflicts and ways to avoid them."

The study is available online here:
http://www.becketfund.org/files/34a97.pdf

Presidential candidate Alan Keyes, AIP leaders sue in CA court to obtain Obama citizenship proof, stop Secretary of State from certifying Electors

2008-11-14T20:07:00.000-08:00

Fenton, MI – November 14, 2008

Presidential candidate Alan Keyes, vice-presidential candidate Wiley S. Drake, and the Chairman of the American Independent Party, Markham Robinson, have filed suit in California Superior Court in Sacramento seeking to bar Secretary of State Debra Bowen from certifying to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger the names of Electors, and from transmitting to each presidential Elector a Certificate of Election, until documentary proof is produced and verified showing that Senator Obama is a “natural born” citizen of the United States, and does not hold citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya or Great Britain.

In addition, they have asked that the court issue a peremptory writ barring Senator Obama’s California Electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until such documentary proof is produced and verified.

In response to questions about why the suit was being filed, Ambassador Alan Keyes commented, “I and others are concerned that this issue be properly investigated and decided before Senator Obama takes office. Otherwise there will be a serious doubt as to the legitimacy of his tenure. This doubt would also affect the respect people have for the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. I hope the issue can be quickly clarified so that the new President can take office under no shadow of doubt. This will be good for him and for the nation.”

Former Reagan administration official Ambassador Alan Keyes and Wiley S. Drake were the 2008 presidential and vice-presidential nominees of the American Independent Party, which is the California affiliate of the new national America’s Independent Party.

Mission Viejo, California attorney Dr. Orly Taitz and United States Justice Foundation Executive Director Gary Kreep are representing the plaintiffs in this case.

Copies of the court filing, along with further information concerning developments in this case, will be made available at http://www.AIPNEWS.com, or can be obtained by contacting AIP national chairman Tom Hoefling.

###

Homofascist Hate Crimes

2008-11-12T09:33:00.001-08:00

The pro-sodomy sociopaths are at it again, this time terrorizing a chuch in East Lansing Michigan, and to think, California Superintendent of Schools, Jack O'Connell wants to enable these perverts to adopt and raise California's children!

On Sunday morning, amidst worshiping congregants and following unifying prayers that our President-elect be granted wisdom as he prepares to lead our nation through difficult global, social and economic challenges, the Michigan left declared open war on peaceful church goers.

They did it with banners, chants, blasphemy, by storming the pulpit, by vandalizing the church facility, by potentially defiling the building with lewd, public, sex acts and by intentionally forcing physical confrontations with worshipers. To read more click here.

Sodomites Threaten to Burn Down Churches and Murder Christians! Gays Committing Hate Crimes!

2008-11-07T08:49:00.002-08:00

Jack O'Connell, Geoff Kors, Kate Kendall, Lorri L. Jean, and Dr. Delores A. Jacobs ran the "No on 8" campaign into the ground. Now, pro-sodomy activists are threatening Christians.

Specifically, they are threatening Mormons and Catholics, the two groups they feel were most reponsible for the defense of marriage in California. They are also threatening to urinate in peoples food at the restaraunt's they work at and to vandalize cars at weddings.

In my opinion, the same "hate speech" laws that homofascists have lobbied for, can and should now be used against them. Let's give them a little taste of their own medicine. Let's show them what happens when you implement fascist anti-free speech laws and maybe next time they will think twice before they do it again. For more click here.

California Election Results

2008-11-05T16:51:00.000-08:00

Prop 8 Passed Defending Marriage!

California’s vote in favor of traditional marriage should give the silent majority comfort that they do have a voice and can and should stand up for this central institution in legislatures throughout the world. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Period.

Prop 11 Passed for Redistricting, which will help conservatives pick up seats the next time around!

Follow the below links for the rest of the results.

Ballot Initiatives: http://vote.sos.ca.gov/props/index.html

State Senate: http://vote.sos.ca.gov/stsen/all.htm

State Assembly: http://vote.sos.ca.gov/stasm/all.htm

Although things went terrible nationally (we elected our first socialist president) the major things in California, that will effect us long term, did not go so bad.

Ryan

Negative Rights and the Role of Government in a Free and Virtuous Society

2008-11-05T10:30:00.001-08:00

Natural human rights are outgrowths of the natural law. The natural law provides us with moral directions about how to live in harmony with others and natural rights exist naturally when we live according to those rules. Natural rights then are an effect, not a cause; they are dependent not subsistent.

Recently, this fact seems to have been forgotten, as fringe groups such as pro-sodomy activists, led by lost minds like that of California Superintendent of School Instruction, Jack O'Connell, campaign for the supposed "RIGHT" to engage in and teach the false-normalcy of various anti-social behaviors.

Thankfully, the passage of marriage amendments in Florida, Arizona, and California, and the protection of children from being adopted by active homosexuals in Arkansas shows that most Americans still recognize, at least implicitly or emotionally, the difference between "Rights" and "Negative Rights;" those behaviors which fall within the boundaries of rational choice and those which constitute mindlessness, savagery, and lead to chaos and an eventual loss of natural rights.

If the state were to create a "negative right" such as the right for two persons of the same-sex to marry or create a so-called "civil union," which places mindless, savage, and chaotic-type behaviors on a pedestal and forces there defence through law, rather than those actions which attempt to conform to reality through knowledge and wisdom, then the state and law become unjust; out of touch with reality; repressive and hurtfull,the state and law become ad hoc and whimsical; law becomes the opposite of law. The law should not rebel against itself. The rebellion of natural rights against the natural law is the rebellion of the branches against the tree. If the rebels were ever to succeed, they would soon find that they destroyed the basis for their own existence.

A Short Note on Rights

2008-11-05T10:30:00.000-08:00

Voters Guide/Find Your Polling Place

2008-11-03T23:41:00.000-08:00

This is it! Election Day is Today! GO VOTE!

You may find your polling place by calling 866-OUR VOTE or by visiting http://www.govote.org/

You may also report voter intimidation to the Secretary of State at 866-687-8683!

VOTING GUIDE

California Propositions

Vote YES ON 4!
Vote YES ON 8!
Vote YES ON 11!
Vote NO ON EVERYTHING ELSE!

You can look up your individual county’s Republican Voting Guide here: http://www.cagop.org/county/

DO NOT VOTE FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CANDIDATES! Especially those candidates who have a symbol next to their name!

California State Senate
Do NOT vote for SD 3 – Mark Leno ▼
Do NOT vote for SD 5 - Lois Wolk
Do NOT vote for SD 7 - Mark DeSaulnier
Do NOT vote for SD 9 – Loni Hancock
Do NOT vote for SD 11 - Joe Simitian ■
Do NOT vote for SD 13 - Elaine Alquist ■
Do NOT vote for SD 19 - Hannah Beth Jackson
Do NOT vote for SD 21 - Carol Liu
Do NOT vote for SD 23 – Fran Pavley
Do NOT vote for SD 27 - Alan Lowenthal ■
Do NOT vote for SD 39 - Christine Kehoe ■ ▼

State Assembly
Do NOT vote for AD 1 - Wesley Chesbro
Do NOT vote for AD 6 - Jared Huffman■
Do NOT vote for AD 7 - Noreen Evans■
Do NOT vote for AD 8 – Mariko Yamada
Do NOT vote for AD 9 - Dave Jones■
Do NOT vote for AD 10 – Alyson Huber
Do NOT vote for AD 11 - Tom Torlakson
Do NOT vote for AD 12 - Fiona Ma ■
Do NOT vote for AD 13 - Tom Ammiano▼
Do NOT vote for AD 14 – Nancy Skinner
Do NOT vote for AD 15 - Joan Buchanan
Do NOT vote for AD 16 - Sandre Swanson ■
Do NOT vote for AD 18 - Mary Hayashi ■
Do NOT vote for AD 19 – Jerry Hill
Do NOT vote for AD 20 - Alberto Torrico ■
Do NOT vote for AD 21 - Ira Ruskin ■
Do NOT vote for AD 22 - Paul Fong
Do NOT vote for AD 23 - Joe Coto ■
Do NOT vote for AD 24 - Jim Beall ■
Do NOT vote for AD 27 – Bill Monning
Do NOT vote for AD 28 - Anna Caballero ■
Do NOT vote for AD 35 - Pedro Nava ■
Do NOT vote for AD 37 – Ferial Masry
Do NOT vote for AD 39 – Felipe Fuentes ■
Do NOT vote for AD 40 – Bob Blumenfi eld
Do NOT vote for AD 41 - Julia Brownley ■
Do NOT vote for AD 42 - Mike Feuer ■
Do NOT vote for AD 43 - Paul Krekorian ■
Do NOT vote for AD 44 - Anthony Portantino ■
Do NOT vote for AD 45 - Kevin de León ■
Do NOT vote for AD 46 - John A. Perez ▼
Do NOT vote for AD 47 - Karen Bass ■
Do NOT vote for AD 49 - Mike Eng ■
Do NOT vote for AD 50 - Hector de la Torre ■
Do NOT vote for AD 51 - Curren Price ■
Do NOT vote for AD 53 - Ted Lieu ■
Do NOT vote for AD 54 - Bonnie Lowenthal
Do NOT vote for AD 56 - Tony Mendoza ■
Do NOT vote for AD 57 - Ed Hernandez ■
Do NOT vote for AD 58 - Charles Calderon ■
Do NOT vote for AD 69 - Jose Solorio ■
Do NOT vote for AD 76 - Lori Saldana ■
Do NOT vote for AD 78 - Marty Block
Do NOT vote for AD 79 - Mary Salas ■
Do NOT vote for AD 80 – Manuel Perez

Throw Your Nest Egg at Obama!

2008-10-31T01:06:00.000-07:00

Recently, students at Texas A&M played a game out in the quad called "Throw Your Nest Egg at Obama!

In short, the group placed card board cut-outs of Barack a.k.a Barry a.k.
a De Soto (or whatever his real first name is?) Hussein Obama out on the lawn, and they had students throw eggs at these card board cut outs!

The "nest eggs" are obviously meant to symbolize your savings and your future earnings under an Obama presidency. Since Obama wants to raise taxes on any American making over $250,000, $150,000, or $42,000 per year (we don't know the actual number because he has used all three of these numbers, each for different audiences).

The game makes a great point, eh!

Vote McCain or else you'll get a "red" communist as your leader! For those of you who don't understand what that means let me say it another way.
YOU WILL NOT MAKE AS MUCH MONEY! THERE WILL BE MORE PEOPLE ON WELFARE! Obama is, in fact, the Welfare Candidate!

So for the Love of God Vote McCain! Not that it matters since most of you live in California which will go to Obama anyway.

"Gay Marriage" = Nightmare!!! And Ca, Superintendent of Schools, Jack O'Connell Supports It? He Should be Fired Now!

2008-10-30T00:23:00.000-07:00

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

BOYNTON BEACH — Carol Anne Burger killed her former lover by stabbing her 222 times with a Phillips-head screwdriver and then took pains to hide her crime, police said Wednesday. Then she got angry when she found out her lover didn't have life insurance that she could collect as a result of her new so-called "gay marriage" benefit!

(It should be noted that anyone refusing to live in accord with their nature as a human being will develop a devastating kind of loneliness, just like these women did, because they are detached from reality.)

Jessica Kalish, who shared a house with Burger despite breaking up with her more than a year ago, was found last Thursday stuffed in the backseat of her gun-metal BMW sedan, abandoned behind a medical office at 2300 S. Congress Avenue. Her blood was splashed around the rear end and undercarriage of the car, as if her killer had tried to load her into the trunk. The driver-side window was shattered.

Read more here.

Why is Barack Obama Always Late for Work??

2008-10-29T11:34:00.000-07:00

NoBama! You Can Keep the Change!!!

2008-10-26T23:38:00.000-07:00

Developing: Obama's Grandmother May Have Confirmed Kenyan Birth

2008-10-26T01:17:00.000-07:00

"Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal as a contributing writer published an article on June 9, 2008, stating that a research team went to Mombassa, Kenya, and located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. at a Kenya Maternity Hospital, to his father, a Kenyan citizen and his mother, a U.S. citizen.

When Jerome Corsi, senior WND investigative reporter, recently traveled to Kenya to investigate several questions about the candidate and his citizenship, he was kidnapped, told the records were sealed, and promptly deported.

For more information click here!

BIDEN GRILLED BY NEWS ANCHOR: IS OBAMA MARXIST?

2008-10-26T01:05:00.001-07:00

Leftist U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick Tosses Lawsuit challenging Obama's Citizenship

2008-10-26T00:57:00.000-07:00

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's citizenship and eligibility to be president. For more click here.

Is Barack Obama a U.S. Citizen? Groups Are Coming Together to Demand That Barack Obama's Name be Pulled from the Ballot.

2008-10-25T10:16:00.000-07:00

According to obamacrimes.com the facts have been established that Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be elected or serve as President of the United States, and that the Court should issue a summary judgment as follows:

That Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen.

That he is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States.
That the Democratic National Committee be enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot.

That the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency.

That Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.

Superintendent Jack O'Connell Spreading Lies! A Father Goes to Jail to Protect His Son From Gay Propagandists in Schools in Mass!

2008-10-24T20:10:00.002-07:00

Jack O'Connell Seduced by Pro-Sodomy Activists to Tell a 96% Lie to California Voters

2008-10-24T15:03:00.000-07:00

Jack O'Connell may look clean-cut and conservative on the outside, but on the inside, he is a discpicable liar and dark propagandist.

Sacramento—Oct. 23—The ProtectMarriage.com—Yes on 8 campaign today criticized the "No on 8" campaign’s new television ad, released yesterday, which features California Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell, jumping into bed with homosexualist lies, and aiding in the spread of the uniquely modern psychological and social pathology known as "gay."

The ad raises a new standard for using a small, cleverly worded kernel of truth to foster the Big Lie.

Specifically, they discussed whether schools are "required" to teach anything about marriage, and states that they are not.

By this logic, presumably, they would argue that no one in California is required to have a drivers’ license, only the people who want to drive cars are.

The real fact, as stated clearly in the "Yes on 8" ads, are that, whether it is technically "required" or not, that virtually all schools in California do teach marriage now, and if gay marriage is legal, they will be REQUIRED to teach about gay marriage as well, because that will be the definition of marriage.

"O’Connell’s cleverly worded denials try to trick voters into thinking schools do not teach about marriage," said Chip White, press secretary for Yes on 8. "But for the 96% of public schools that teach sex education, state law requires them to teach about marriage."

The California Department of Education’s own website says that 96 % of public schools provide instruction under the Comprehensive Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Prevention Act (Educ. Code Sec. 51930, et seq.) and every school that provides instruction under that Act must provide instruction and materials that teach about marriage. Additionally, the Department of Education’s own checklist for instruction under the Act confirms that instruction about marriage is required for the school district to be in compliance with state law.

"There is no foundation for O’Connell’s untruthful statements that nothing in California law requires teaching about marriage," said Andrew Pugno, general counsel for Yes on 8. "The voters deserve to hear the truth. While O’Connell may personally favor gay marriage, as a public official it is his obligation to tell the truth about California’s education laws."

The Yes on 8 campaign sent a letter to O’Connell yesterday demanding that he retract his misstatements. The letter, which is attached, identifies Education Code sections that demonstrate public schools do teach about marriage, at a rate of 96%.

"Perhaps if O’Connell spent less time making false statements in TV ads," said White, "he’d have more time to read his own website."

# # #

FACT SHEET

Superintendent O’Connell:“Prop 8 has nothing to do with schools…Our schools aren’t required to teach anything about marriage…”

FACT:

CaliforniaEducation Code (EC) 51933 specifies that school districts are not required to provide comprehensive sexual health education, but if they choose to do so, they shall comply with all of the requirements listed below.

…Instruction shall encourage communication between students and their

families and shallteach respect for marriageand committed

relationships.(http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/he/se/sexeducation.asp)

FACT:According to a study posted on the California Department of Education’s (CDE’s) website, 96% of California school districts voluntarily provide classroom instruction under the California Comprehensive Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Prevention Act (Education Code,§§51930et seq). That study states:

HIV/AIDS prevention education and sex education are nearly universally taught inCaliforniatoday. Ninety-four percent of surveyed schools

provide HIV/AIDS prevention education, as is mandated by law, and an

even larger number, 96%, provide sex education despite having no

requirement to do so.

ACLU/PB Consulting report,“Sex Education in California Public Schools,”August 2003, page 5.

Superintendent O’Connell:“Using kids to lie about that is shameful…”

FACT: O’Connell seems content to accuse supporters of Prop 8 of“lying”while deliberately ignoring the rules and researchof his own department.

YCC Weekly Update!

2008-10-20T13:46:00.000-07:00

1) Ryan Sorba to Debate Princeton Theological Seminary Alum on Marriage and Prop. 8 at Cal State San Marcos on October 28, at noon.

2) ISI Lecture! Dinesh D’Souza will defend the free market and the virue of prosperity at the University of the Pacific on October 23 at 6 p.m.

3) Opportunities to help the McCain Palin ticket in swing states, Colorado and Nevada

4) Attend a YAF Conference and stay at the Reagan Ranch! Only $60, hotel and food included!

5) Seven new YCC Chapters now on college campuses!

6) Qaulcon Stadium to host HUGE pro-marriage rally Nov. 1st.

============================================

1) Ryan Sorba to Debate Princeton Alum on Marriage and Proposition 8

On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 Ryan Sorba will debate Margo McKenna at California State University, San Marcos at 12 p.m. on the subject of marriage.

McKenna, a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary refers to herself as a “Reverend” and presides over the “Chalice Unitarian Universalist Congregation.” Unitarian Universalist’s, is should be noted, believe that all disparate religions and philosophies are correct in their understanding of reality. McKenna, in all her “Universality,” will defend the pro-sodomy movement’s demands that California change the central concept (the essence) of the definition of marriage to “consent,” while Sorba’s will unleash all the power of the natural law against her misconceptions. To learn more about Ryan’s apponant click here: http://www.chaliceuu.org/aboutMargo.htm

============================================

2) ISI Lecture!

Technology, the Market, and the Virtue of Prosperity

Dinesh D’Souza, prominent author and the Robert and Karen Rishwain Fellow at the Hoover Institution will discuss “Technology, the Market, and the Virute of Proserity” at the University of the Pacific, in Grace Covell Hall, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, California 95211 on October 23 at 6 p.m.

For more info click visit: http://www.isi.org/calendar/eventDetail.aspx?id=4AE45333-FE9A-4E3D-A76F-619F834A7325

============================================

3) The McCain Palin campaign is welcoming anyone who can come to Colorado to work for a McCain Palin Victory!

Volunteers are responsible for their own transportation, lodging and meals. Consider it a last minute campaign contribution and make it a trip with your friends! If you are interested in taking part of the McCain 72 hour Campaign please email Marc Massey your resume at mmassey@mccain08hq.com.

What: 72 hour Campaign
When: Oct 31st - Nov.5th
Where: Denver, Colorado
Who: YOU!

============================================

4) YAF Conference

Apply now before the $60 rate increases for the Young America's Foundation West Coast Leadership Conference Nov 14-15 in Santa Barbara!

Apply now at http://www.regonline.com/wclc08.

Confirmed speakers include Michael Reagan, Dennis Prager, Rep. Mark Souder (IN), Nicole Hoplin, Frank Donatelli, Ron Robinson, and many more! Meet like-minded peers, learn conservative ideas, and get valuable resources all in beautiful Santa Barbara, CA!

Merit-based travel scholarships are available by application. Please reply if you need more information.

============================================

5) Five new YCC clubs!

In recent weeks, through the help of the Leadership Institute, five new YCC chapters have formed. First, the Brooks Institue has formed a YCC Conservative Film club. The Club intends to create conservative documentaries and films. In addition two YCC conservative Book clubs have sprung up at Cal State Long Beach and UC Riverside and YCC pro-life groups have formed at Cal State L.A. and UC Riverside.

============================================

6) Qualcom Stadium Pro-Marriage Rally!

Join the largest gathering of pro-marriage supporters ever to assemble at Qaulcom stadium in San Diego on November 1st! Bring and energize your friends to vote YES ON 8! Visit the following link for more info.

http://thecall.com/

============================================

Viva la conservative revolucion,

Ryan Sorba

Barack Obama & Raila Odinga

2008-10-13T17:15:00.000-07:00

Obama launched his career in the home of a terrorist and uses US taxpayer's money to fly to Kenya to campaign for a communist. Of course he can't spare any money for his brother who lives in a metal shack - so much for family values and helping the poor.

Help Defend Marriage: Donate Now to Yes on Prop 8!!

2008-10-08T23:30:00.000-07:00

Dear YCC Member,

Please remember to vote YES ON Proposition 8, which states that "only marriage between a man and woman shall be recognized or valid in the state of California."

Recently, the polls have shown that we are in for a tight race and right now we need all the financial help we can get to defend marriage.

Even if you don't live in California, you should consider making a donation. Remember that if the homosexualists win in California, they will head on over to your state next.

I just donated $100.

You can donate any amount, even just $5 will help.

Donate now...or forever rest your peace.

Donate here: https://www.icontribute.us/protectmarriage/initiative/main

VOTE YES ON 8!!

Ryan

Alleging fraud, authorities raid Barack Obama's Previous Employer: "ACORN"

2008-10-08T10:10:00.001-07:00

ACORN's canvassers filled out forms with fake names, addresses, officials say

State authorities on Tuesday raided an organization that registers low-income people to vote, alleging that its canvassers falsified forms with bogus names, fake addresses or famous personalities.

The secretary of state's office launched an investigation after noticing that names did not match addresses and that most members of the Dallas Cowboys appeared to be registering in Nevada to vote in November's general election.

"Some of these (forms) were facially fraudulent; we basically had the starting lineup for the Dallas Cowboys," Secretary of State Ross Miller said. "Tony Romo is not registered to vote in Nevada. Anyone trying to pose as Terrell Owens won't be able to cast a ballot."

To read more click here.

KENYA DETAINS ANTI-OBAMA REPORTER...

2008-10-07T09:59:00.001-07:00

NAIROBI, Kenya – The government of Kenya is holding WND senior staff reporter Jerome Corsi in custody at immigration headquarters after police picked him up at his hotel just prior to a scheduled news conference in which he planned to announce the findings of his investigation into Barack Obama's connections in the country.

Corsi, the author of the No. 1 best-selling book "The Obama Nation," was picked up by authorities at his hotel at 9:45 a.m. and detained at Nyayo House, the provincial headquarters for Nairobi.

To read more click here.

A Message from Mike Huckubee

2008-10-05T22:24:00.000-07:00

Dear Huck PACkers-

I wanted to write you to convey my disgust with the passing of this 451 page bailout bill. Wall Street has gone trick-or-treating in Washington a little bit early this October. Wall Street is getting the treats and America is getting tricked. The “Axis of Arrogance” has tried to pull the wool over the eyes of the Main Streeters and in doing so hid a sty full of pork in a bill whose constitutionality is questionable at best. Friends, the folks in Washington continue to treat your wallet as their tip jar and this has to stop.

Just check out a few provisions in this bill:

Sec. 211. Transportation fringe benefit to bicycle commuters

Sec. 308. Increase in limit on cover over of rum excise tax to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

Sec. 309. Extension of economic development credit for American Samoa.

Sec. 312. Deduction allowable with respect to income attributable to domestic production activities in Puerto Rico.

Sec. 317. Seven-year cost recovery period for a motorsports racing track facility.

Sec. 322. Tax incentives for investment in the District of Columbia.

Sec. 325. Extension and modification of duty suspension on wool products; wool research fund; wool duty refunds.

At a time when we are at “ground zero” and on the verge of an all out financial collapse, I am disgusted that these provisions were made.

At a time when Congress had the opportunity to do something to help the American economy, they lived up to their low approval rating. The only thing we can thank Congress for right now is that they are consistent. They are consistently spending money that doesn’t belong to them, consistently expanding pork projects, consistently doing nothing to help rebuild the American economy and consistently hurting the future of our country. Ultimately, they are consistently ignoring their own values, principles and beliefs and as a result, the American People are going to have to suffer.

Without the bailout there might have been some temporary hurt, but the long term effect will be far worse because of the precedent this bill has set and the “Bail-Aholics” it will create. Within minutes of the bill passing the state of California was already in line asking to be the next recipient of a Government hand out. We are creating an economy where you cannot fail and by doing so disabling our ability to ever truly succeed.

I am afraid this is just the beginning of the bailouts. We must not go silent into the night, we have to continue to fight and stand up against these legislators.
Consider contributing $4.51, a penny for every page of this ludicrous bill to Huck PAC. We will use it to help fund a changing of the guard and restore trust back to our government.
Stay strong in the fight,
Mike Huckabee

PS: I’ll also be addressing this issue on the 2nd edition of “Huckabee” this weekend on the Fox News Channel. We will only be on Sunday night at 8pm ET, 7pm CT due to an already scheduled special that will run Saturday night. After this week, my show will air on both Saturday and Sunday at 8pm ET, 7pm CT. Please email all your friends and those on your email directory and ask them to watch.

We have had an enormous number of comments regarding the issue of the Congressional bailout. It has ignited passions of Americans from coast to coast like few things have and yet in the bubble of D. C., they really don’t seem to understand.

I hope you’ll join HuckPAC with your prayers, contributions, and actions to help good people get elected in the next 30 days. I hope you’ll share your comments with me and engage in the online conversation we’ll be having over the next couple of days on the issue of the bailout and your reactions to my show on Fox News Channel.

God bless you!

Why the Current Financial Crisis is the Democrats Fault

2008-09-29T10:50:00.000-07:00

Not So Basic Economics: Free Markets & Civil Society

2008-09-25T22:20:00.000-07:00

Are you confused about the current fiancial crisis in the United States? If so, take a short course in econimics now free, with the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, and figure out where you stand when it comes to government intervention in our markets.

To take the short course simply click here.

Iran, Nuclear Bombs, and Madmen

2008-09-22T22:10:00.000-07:00

By CAROLINE GLICK

Iran is just a heartbeat away from the A-bomb.Last Friday the Daily Telegraph reported Teheran has surreptitiously removed a sufficient amount of uranium from its nuclear production facility in Isfahan to produce six nuclear bombs. Given Iran's already acknowledged uranium enrichment capabilities, the Telegraph's report indicates that the Islamic Republic is now in the late stages of assembling nuclear bombs.

It would be a simple matter for Iran to assemble those bombs without anyone noticing. US spy satellites recently discovered what the US believes are covert nuclear facilities in Iran. The mullocracy has not disclosed these sites to the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency, which is charged with inspecting Iran's nuclear sites.

As to the IAEA, this week it presented its latest report on Teheran's nuclear program to its board members in Vienna. The IAEA's report claimed that Iran has taken steps to enable its Shihab-3 ballistic missiles to carry nuclear warheads. With their range of 1,300 kilometers, Shihab-3 missiles are capable of reaching Israel and other countries throughout the region.
In support of its swiftly progressing nuclear program, Iran has escalated both its conventional military and terroristic adventurism. It has also ratcheted up its diplomatic assault on the US. This week, Teheran conducted a countrywide air defense exercise. Gen. Khatim al-Anbiaa, the commander of Iran's Air Defense Corps, explained that the exercise was aimed at defending against both electronic jamming systems and actual bombing strikes.

Also this week, Yahya Rahim Safavi, the former commander of the Revolutionary Guards Corps and current senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei for security affairs, announced that Iran has shifted responsibility for naval warfare on the Persian Gulf from its regular naval forces to its more fanatical Revolutionary Guards. The Iranian navy will now be deployed only in the Gulf of Oman and along the Caspian Sea.

The deployment of the Guards along the Persian Gulf means that the force will be responsible for naval operations in the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which 40 percent of global oil shipments travel. Issuing Iran's most explicit threat to US naval forces in the area and global oil shipments to date, Safavi declared, "The entire Strait of Hormuz is under the tight control of the Iranian security forces, which are ready to defend Iran against any threat."

To finish the article click here.

A liberal Democrat,David Blankenhorn, backs Proposition 8

2008-09-22T16:20:00.001-07:00

By David Blankenhorn

I'm a liberal Democrat. And I do not favor same-sex marriage. Do those positions sound contradictory? To me, they fit together.Many seem to believe that marriage is simply a private love relationship between two people. They accept this view, in part, because Americans have increasingly emphasized and come to value the intimate, emotional side of marriage, and in part because almost all opinion leaders today, from journalists to judges, strongly embrace this position. That's certainly the idea that underpinned the California Supreme Court's legalization of same-sex marriage.

But I spent a year studying the history and anthropology of marriage, and I've come to a different conclusion.Marriage as a human institution is constantly evolving, and many of its features vary across groups and cultures. But there is one constant. In all societies, marriage shapes the rights and obligations of parenthood. Among us humans, the scholars report, marriage is not primarily a license to have sex. Nor is it primarily a license to receive benefits or social recognition. It is primarily a license to have children. In this sense, marriage is a gift that society bestows on its next generation. Marriage (and only marriage) unites the three core dimensions of parenthood -- biological, social and legal -- into one pro-child form: the married couple.

Marriage says to a child: The man and the woman whose sexual union made you will also be there to love and raise you. Marriage says to society as a whole: For every child born, there is a recognized mother and a father, accountable to the child and to each other. These days, because of the gay marriage debate, one can be sent to bed without supper for saying such things. But until very recently, almost no one denied this core fact about marriage.

Summing up the cross-cultural evidence, the anthropologist Helen Fisher in 1992 put it simply: "People wed primarily to reproduce." The philosopher and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell, certainly no friend of conventional sexual morality, was only repeating the obvious a few decades earlier when he concluded that "it is through children alone that sexual relations become important to society, and worthy to be taken cognizance of by a legal institution."Marriage is society's most pro-child institution.

In 2002 -- just moments before it became highly unfashionable to say so -- a team of researchers from Child Trends, a nonpartisan research center, reported that "family structure clearly matters for children, and the family structure that helps children the most is a family headed by two biological parents in a low-conflict marriage." All our scholarly instruments seem to agree: For healthy development, what a child needs more than anything else is the mother and father who together made the child, who love the child and love each other. For these reasons, children have the right, insofar as society can make it possible, to know and to be cared for by the two parents who brought them into this world. The foundational human rights document in the world today regarding children, the 1989 U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, specifically guarantees children this right. The last time I checked, liberals like me were supposed to be in favor of internationally recognized human rights, particularly concerning children, who are typically society's most voiceless and vulnerable group. Or have I now said something I shouldn't? Every child being raised by gay or lesbian couples will be denied his birthright to both parents who made him. Every single one. Moreover, losing that right will not be a consequence of something that at least most of us view as tragic, such as a marriage that didn't last, or an unexpected pregnancy where the father-to-be has no intention of sticking around. On the contrary, in the case of same-sex marriage and the children of those unions, it will be explained to everyone, including the children, that something wonderful has happened.

For me, what we are encouraged or permitted to say, or not say, to one another about what our society owes its children is crucially important in the debate over initiatives like California's Proposition 8, which would reinstate marriage's customary man-woman form. Do you think that every child deserves his mother and father, with adoption available for those children whose natural parents cannot care for them? Do you suspect that fathers and mothers are different from one another? Do you imagine that biological ties matter to children? How many parents per child is best? Do you think that "two" is a better answer than one, three, four or whatever? If you do, be careful. In making the case for same-sex marriage, more than a few grown-ups will be quite willing to question your integrity and goodwill. Children, of course, are rarely consulted.

By David Blankenhorn

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa Engages in Pro-Sodomy Activism!

2008-09-19T22:49:00.002-07:00

On Saturday, September 20, from 10 a.m. to noon, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa will come out of the closet as an open supporter of sodomy.

Villaraigosa is expected to "wave signs" promoting sodomy and then to make "phone calls" to random Los Angeles voters, urging them to support the behavior. One can only wonder which unlucky Los Angelian will recieve that awkward phone call.

The event will take place at 1125 N. McCadden Place. Keep your children away.

What is Wrong with Joe Biden?

2008-09-15T08:28:00.001-07:00

One of Sen. Biden's most enduring qualities is his tendency to say things he wishes he hadn't. Since being picked as Barack Obama's VP, he's referred to his running mate as "Barack America," referred to a future administration as a "Biden administration" and who last week at a rally shouted out to Missouri State Sen. Chuck Graham, "Chuck, stand up, let people see you." (Sen. Graham is confined to a wheelchair.)

But while Biden's reputation for being a one-man verbal wrecking crew is well-known, yesterday's supposed gaffe may not have been. While in Nashua, N.H., Biden told the crowd, "Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States. … Quite frankly, it might have been a better pick than me." It seems as though the question must be asked, "What is wrong with Joe Biden?"

A perfect example of why California needs Prop 8

2008-09-10T00:00:00.000-07:00

According to a WorldNetDaily article, "Brides" and "grooms" are no longer allowed to marry in the State of California. That privilege is only extended to individuals who allow themselves to be called "Party A" and "Party B" on marriage licenses.

Pastor Doug Bird of Abundant Life Fellowship in Roseville, Calif., was alarmed to find the state now rejects the traditional terms after he officiated his first marriage ceremony last week following the California Supreme Court decision to overturn Proposition 22.

The couple had written the words "bride" and "groom" next to "Party A" and "Party B" because they wanted to be legally recognized as husband and wife.

However, the Placer County marriage license was denied.

"I received back the license and a letter from the Placer County Clerk/Recorder stating that the license 'does not comply with California State registration laws,'" Bird said in a statement from the Pacific Justice Institute.

It was an "unacceptable alteration," the County Recorder's Office claimed the State Office of Vital Records determined.

"What's next?" Bird wrote in a Sept. 4 letter. "Will the State of California force [ministers] to use the terms "Party A" and "Party B" in the ceremony itself?"

In a 4-3 decision, California's high court declared that legal definitions of marriage as a union between a man and a woman were unconstitutional. Since the ruling, the generic designations have been added to legal documents.

Pacific Justice Institute President Brad Dacus said voters must change the state constitution by voting on the marriage amendment in November if they wish to preserve the traditional meaning of marriage.

"Unless Proposition 8 is passed, heterosexual couples will be forced to wed out of the state if they wish to be officially identified as bride and groom or husband and wife." He said in a statement. "This is a major slap in the face for traditional marriage."

Want to sound off? Use the contact information below to voice your opinion.

Jim McCauley, County Clerk-Recorder-Registrar of Voters
2954 Richardson DriveAuburn, CA 95603
Recordings - (530) 886-5600Clerk - (530) 886-5610
Fax: (530) 886-5687E-mail: clerk@placer.ca.gov

Apply for the 2008-09 ISI Honors Program Now!

2008-09-09T00:18:00.000-07:00

The ISI Honors Program is a highly selective year-long mentoring fellowship for fifty of the nation’s most promising undergraduates. Honors Fellows are assigned an Academic Mentor who guides them through reading projects, and advises on intellectual questions and career options. Fellows explore the West’s intellectual tradition at a week-long, all-expenses-paid summer conference, at weekend colloquia, and through an online listserve.

Fellows receive an array of ISI publications, including American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia and Modern Age, and are notified of employment, fellowship, and internship opportunities.

To learn how to become an ISI Honors Fellow now click here.

McCain and Palin Surge Into the Lead

2008-09-08T18:38:00.000-07:00

The USAToday/Gallup poll shows McCain ahead 54 percent to 44 percent among likely voters and 50 percent to 46 percent among registered voters. This poll arbitrarily excludes a certain percentage of LVs from the category of RVs depending on their response to a series of questions. In practice, its LV results have been far more volatile than other polls. But for that reason, it is one of the better measures we have for voter enthusiasm and therefore, perhaps, for turnout. During most of this year, Democrats have been more enthusiastic than Republicans. This poll suggests that the Sarah Palin/John McCain convention has narrowed or eliminated the enthusiasm gap.

Just about every poll released today shows a McCain surge. The Rasmussen track shows McCain up 48 percent to 47 percent, compared with 48 to 48 yesterday. The Gallup track shows McCain ahead 49 to 44, up from 48 to 45 yesterday. The Diageo/Hotline track showed a 44-to-44 tie, compared with a 6 percent lead for Obama in its most recent report. We haven't seen much in the way of state results yet, except that Anchorage-based Ivan Moore, who polls for Democrats but has worked for Republicans in the past, shows McCain-Palin way ahead, 54 percent to 35 percent, in Alaska, where his previous poll showed Obama trailing McCain by only 2.5 percent. "Obama had a real shot to score an upset in Alaska," the Britain-born Moore writes, "but that opportunity is categorically gone."

Bottom line: Obama was a little ahead going into the conventions. McCain is a little ahead coming out of the conventions. On to the debates!

By Michael Barone

Ryan Sorba takes on "Young Turk" talk show host, Cenk Uygur!

2008-09-07T17:56:00.000-07:00

This week, during the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota, Young Conservatives of California state chair, Ryan Sorba stunned online talk show host Cenk Uygur in a debate which centered around the nature of the pro-sodomy movement in America.

It began when Ryan Sorba handed the book Barack Obama: The Audacity of Deceit to "Young Turk" talk show host Cenk Uygur. Uygur told Ryan to sit down and have some fun on the radio. Little did Uygur know Ryan Sorba was the only one about to have fun! In fact, by the time the interview had ended Uygar was spouting near obscenities and Ryan was smiling and shaking hands with former California governor Pete Wilson!

Click here to watch the intense interview unfold.

It was trial by fire recently for seven Leadership Institute trainees in Washington, D.C.

2008-09-07T17:55:00.001-07:00

The Washington, DC-based Leadership Institute (LI) is a conservative organization that trains and places conservatives in leadership positions on college campuses and in the media. As part of the Institute's field representative program, seven trainees were sent to Washington, DC's Dupont Circle to gather signatures for a petition in support of traditional marriage. The training exercise allowed the representatives to practice "running a membership table" and to "engage interested passers-by."

Dupont Circle is known for having a sizable liberal and homosexual population. Barry Broussard of Mississippi, one of the trainees, notes the numerous angry reactions and foul gestures they received. However, he also said they "drew a lot of encouragement from people just driving by and giving us the 'thumbs-up.'"

Another trainee, Daniel Cervera, said the hateful responses did not upset him. However, he was pleasantly surprised by the enthusiasm of those grateful for their presence.

Ian Ivey, director of communications for LI, says they were able to gather 88 signatures.

"One of the things that surprised us the most about this exercise in Dupont Circle was that a group of people came down from the tenth floor of a nearby building – they came out basically...in favor of traditional marriage as well," Ivey explains. "So our group there actually attracted quite a bit of attention both from leftists who were irritated by their presence, but also from conservatives who came up and said, 'Boy, are we glad to see you here. It is so refreshing to see someone standing up for traditional values.'"

The petition drive, according to Ivey, was a way to give the trainees hands-on experience before they are sent to college campuses to train students to organize their own conservative groups.

The Poison of Barack Hussein Obama Jr.

2008-09-05T23:11:00.001-07:00

I have been deeply disappointed to hear even friends of mine mention that simply because Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is clean cut and speaks well that he would make a good U.S. President. But when asked about what Obama stands for, most who lend him credence can give no answer. Apparently, for far too many, all it takes to qualify for the presidency are public speaking skills, never mind accomplishments or experience. And while we are on the subject of accomplishments, let me list a few personal, social, fiscal, and foreign policy measures that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. backs.

Socially, Barack Hussein Obama voted against filtering pornography on elementary school library computers, he voted for "sex education" for kindergarten children, and in 2001, Barack Hussein Obama voted "present" on a bill to keep pornographic book stores, video stores, and strip clubs from setting up within 1,000 feet of schools and churches. For some reason, the man apparently has no problem with ramming perversion in the face of school children and church goers.

In addition to his practical perversion, Barack Hussein Obama has voted against bills prohibiting the tax funding of abortions twice. Apparently, he wants you to pay for the murder of innocent children. In 2001, Barack Hussein Obama voted "present" on a bill which would notify parents when their minor children seek an abortion. In 2003, as chairman of the Senate Committee to which the Alive Infants Protection Act was sent, Barack Hussein Obama prevented it from even getting a hearing. All that BAIPA stated, by the way, was that live-born babies are guaranteed the same constitutional right to equal protection under law as all other human beings, whether or not they are wanted. Essentially, Barack Hussein Obama voted to allow newborns to be killed by women who just don't feel like signing papers so that their living babies can be adopted. Apparently, Barack Hussein Obama's wife, Michelle, is even worse. In February 2004, she sent out a fundraising letter, which actually stated her concern over the rise of conservatism in the Country, and that partial-birth abortion was a legitimate medical procedure that should be protected. Barack Hussein Obama also voted against a cloning ban in 2000 and touts the fact that he is an advocate of so-called "homosexual marriages."

As far as foreign policy in concerned, Barack Hussein Obama might as well be on the side of Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. Obviously, Barack Hussein Obama's has a Muslim name. Less obviously, his father is a devout Muslim and has four wives in Africa. Obama's picture is currently displayed on the page BANNER of Project Islamic H.O.P.E. which follows the teachings of the "Holy Quran" and the example of "Prophet Muhammad." Project Islamic H.O.P.E. supports and follows the leadership of Imam W. Deen Mohammed, one of the world's foremost Islamic leaders. Hussein Obama's "Black Power Pastor Wright" supports Louis Farrakhan, and in 1984 traveled with him to visit the anti-semite Col. Muammar al-Gadaffi, an archenemy of Israel and America and a firm supporter of terror groups. Obama's own pastor has also been a severe critic of Israel. In his own pastors words: "The Israelis have illegally occupied Palestinian territories for almost 40 years now. It took a divestment campaign to wake the business community up concerning the South Africa issue. Divestment has now hit the table again as a strategy to wake the business community up and to wake Americans up concerning the injustice and the racism under which the Palestinians have lived because of Zionism." (http://islamichope.org/) Barack Hussein Obama has also been quoted as saying, "nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people" and that "the lives of more than 3,000 soldiers killed in Iraq have been wasted."

In addition, Obama's Muslim and Marxist first cousin, Raila Odinga, has run for the presidency of Muslim Kenya and upon losing, in traditional Marxist form, rejected the results of the election and instead spurned wide-scale violence in protest. Barack Hussein Obama's father, grandfather, grandmother, four brothers, and sister are all Muslim. He has a Muslim name and attended Muslim school for two years. What's worse is that the Muslim world believes that he is still a Muslim parading as a Christian. They believe that this is acceptable because under Islamic law, a Muslim is morally justified in doing anything to destroy those who refuse to convert. And if Barack Hussein Obama really is a Christian, then he is up for the death penalty in half the Muslim world under Shariah Law for abandoning the Muslim religion.

Barack Hussein Obama is also a closet racist. In the period from high school in Hawaii, to Columbia University, and then to the streets of Chicago as a community organizer, Obama described his world thusly: "We were always playing on the white man's court -- by the white man's rules. If the principal, or the coach, or a teacher wanted to spit in your face, he could, because he had the power and you didn't. The only thing you could choose was withdrawal into a smaller and smaller coil of rage." Later in life, Barack Hussein Obama described the white race as "that ghostly figure that haunted black dreams." "That hate hadn't gone away," he wrote, blaming "white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives." (http://www.examiner.com/a-536474~_Trapped_between_two_worlds_.html)

From here, Barack Hussein Obama went on to become an agitator and "leftist political organizer" for Mike Kruglick, who followed the radical communist organizer Saul Alinsky. And the agitator's job, according to Alinsky, "is first to bring folks to the 'realization' that they are indeed miserable, that their misery is the fault of unresponsive governments or greedy corporations, then help them to bond together to demand what they deserve, and to make such an almighty stink that the dastardly governments and corporations will see imminent 'self-interest' in granting whatever it is that will cause the harassment to cease." In these methods, euphemistically labeled "community organizing," Barack Hussein Obama had a four-year education, which he often says was the "best education he ever got anywhere." After reading this it should be no surprise that one of Barack Hussein Obama's key supporters is the anti-American, George Soros.

Another one of Barack Husseun Obama's key supporters is the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), the nation's largest Hispanic Nazi-type organization. La Raza is Spanish for "the race," and although NCLR claims it means "community" on their website, La Raza supports legislation such as the "Civil Liberties Restoration Act," which would roll back policies adopted after Sept. 11 designed to protect national security. It also supports the "DREAM Act," which would mandate states to offer in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens -thus providing them with benefits that are not even available to U.S. citizens from other states. La Raza (The Race) also believes that the lower third of the United States still belongs to Mexico and that it is destined to be returned to Mexico someday.

In closing, although Barack Hussein Obama is polished on the surface, the chain smoker's stand on the defenseless seems cold to the core, his racist attitude shameful, his foreign policy is chilling and the number one front in the War on Terror in my view, has now shifted from the Middle East to "Election 2008," and we are on the front lines. Barack Hussein Obama Jr. has been voted the most liberal U.S. Senator. For this scarlet letter he has beaten out both Hillary Clinton who placed a meager 16th and Ted Kennedy himself. As the September air chills most of the nation, I am developing gooseflesh for more reasons than just the temperature.

By Ryan Sorba

A Case for Israel

2008-08-24T22:58:00.000-07:00

By Sammy Levine

Israel is a sprawling, industrialized Democracy where its citizens enjoy freedom and individual liberty comparable to that found in America. The freest Arabs in the Middle East reside in Israel, and the nation desperately wants peace.

Outside of the gates of Israel, however, Middle Eastern dictators rule their respective nations with an iron fist, by depriving their own citizens of basic liberties, treating their women like second rate citizens, and openly advocating for the extermination of the Jews.

One such dictator is the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ajhmadinejad. In the past, Ajhmadinejad has labeled Israel, "a rotten stinking corpse." Recently he has called for Israel to be, "wiped off the map." Most seriously, the dictator is now seeking Nuclear weapons. Does anyone doubt his purpose?

Although some blame Israel for the instability in the Middle East, a brief look at the history of the Middle East will tell the real story. In 1947 the Palestinian Arabs were offered their own state, adjacent to Israel, by the United Nations partition plan (resolution 181). This offer was flatly rejected by the Arab states in the region and Palestine. Many Palestinian's then left their homes because they were promised a swift return by the five neighboring Arab countries, who had just declared war on Israel, and were planning to annihilate the Jews. However, Israel won its War of Independence in 1948 against unbelievable odds.

In 1967, all of Israel’s neighbors mobilized for a simultaneous attack against the Jewish state. However, Israel launched a pre-emptive strike, ending the war in only six days, an incredible military achievement. In 1973, a coalition of Arab states, including Egypt and Syria, launched a surprise attack against Israel. As usual, Israel successfully defended itself.

Despite repeated attempts to annihilate the small nation, in the summer of 2000, Israel made an incredibly generous offer to the Palestinian Arabs that included Israeli withdrawal from 95% of the West Bank and 100% of the Gaza Strip, to form a Palestinian state. Under the arrangement, the Palestinians would control parts of Jerusalem, including most of the old city, and slivers of Israel to compensate for parts of the West Bank left out. The Palestinian's, led by the father of modern terrorism, Yasser Arafat, not only rejected this offer but responded with a new wave of suicide bombings, sparking the second intifadah.

Israel vacated most of Southern Lebanon in 1986, and all of it in 2000. Shortly after, this region was taken over by Hezbollah, a brutal terrorist organization funded by Iran, and committed to the destruction of Israel. In 2006, in a daring cross border raid, Hezbollah killed several Israeli soldiers, captured two more, and launched rockets into Israel, starting the very costly 2nd Lebanon war which led to the deaths of hundreds of Israeli's and thousands of Lebanese. About a year ago Israel returned the occupied Gaza strip to the Palestinian people, and what happened? Gaza is now controlled by Hamas, another brutal terrorist organization committed to the destruction of Israel. Since Israel vacated Gaza, over four thousand (4,000) rockets have been fired into Israel from the formerly occupied Gaza territories.

Given this pattern of past events, can there be any doubt about what will occur if Israel hands over the West Bank to the Palestinians or the Golan heights to the Syrians? Israel currently occupies these lands for national security purposes, not because of nefarious or imperialistic goals to rule the Middle East.

Amidst a clear history of repeated attempts to annihilate the Jews, some critics claim that Israel constantly uses a disproportionate amount of force against its enemies. The truth of the matter is that Israel uses much more restraint than its adversaries. While Israel, to its detriment, meticulously aims at only combatants and military targets, these militants intentionally aim their weaponry and suicide bombs at Israeli civilians. When the Israeli army accidentally kills innocent Palestinian civilians it is viewed as a true tragedy by the Israeli's that is regrettably unavoidable in the scope of war. However, when Hamas kills innocent men, women, and children in Israel, Palestinians celebrate jubilantly in the streets and hand out candy. This was the case after the terrorist attack against the yeshiva in Jerusalem a couple months ago, where 10 Jews were killed, most of them teenagers. In this example, the incredible moral disparity between the Israelis and the Palestinians is abundantly clear. Currently, Israel has the military power to annihilate the Palestinians but does not. Is there any delusion about what would happen to Israel if the roles were reversed; if Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran had this capability?

The truth of the matter is that Israel desperately wants peace, but in order for this wish to become a reality Israel needs an able and willing partner. Until radical Islam, the driving force of Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah and similar terrorist groups and states is squelched in the region, any genuine attempts by moderate Arabs to partner with Israel to make peace will be subverted and obstructed by radicals resorting to the only thing they have been successful at in the last 60 years; indiscriminate acts of terror and violence. As such, Israel must pursue an unflinching military campaign to destroy the terrorists and protect its cities.

Watch a Lecture: Dante's Divine Comedy

2008-08-12T16:41:00.000-07:00

Click here.

Bush warns Russia; Medvedev orders halt to action

2008-08-12T16:25:00.000-07:00

President Bush consulted Tuesday with fellow leaders in Eastern and Western Europe about the crisis in the former Soviet republic of Georgia while aides scrambled to evaluate a Russian promise to stop attacking its neighbor. The White House also rejected a Russian call for Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili to step down.
Earlier, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev ordered a halt to its military action in Georgia, saying the campaign had brought security in its South Ossetia region that is close to Moscow.

"The aggressor has been punished and suffered very significant losses. Its military has been disorganized," Medvedev said in a nationally televised statement.

His order came just hours after Bush's strongest statement on the fighting since it began at the end of last week. He demanded that Russia withdraw its troops from Georgia, end what he called a "dramatic and brutal escalation" of violence, and accept international mediation to end the crisis. Bush said Russia's actions had "substantially damaged Russia's standing in the world."

For more click here.

Young Conservatives of America

Cory Spruill, Ex-Edward Little High School Homosexual Football Player Sends Christians "Gay" Porn on Facebook

Cory Spruill

Kathlene O'Loughlin: Neo-Pagan, Anti-Christian Activist Cusses Out Conservatives, Makes False Accusations

Kathlene O'LoughlinMarriage was not ordained by God. Marriage was a pagan ritual that Christians stole along with everything else (hello Easter anyone?) Native Americans performed two-spirit (lgbt) marriages before Columbus ever set foot here.

She went on to cuss-out a woman named Carmella, who simply disagreed with her pagan sex practices. She referred to her as a "waspy rug" and a "bigot."

Kathlene O'Loughlinthis is the 2nd time I'm blocked in 2 days because bigots want to sweep the truth under their waspy rugs.19 minutes ago · Like ·

Kathlene O'Loughlinthis is the 2nd time I'm blocked in 2 days because bigots want to sweep the truth under their waspy rugs.

In one post she almost went off on Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg:

Kathlene O'LoughlinMaggie, Carmella deleted my link, I waited a few seconds and posted it again and got a popup from fb saying I'm blocked because of spam. Because Carmella is a coward and censored me.

Should “Gays” Be a Part of the Conservative Movement Part III: Why David Swindle Should Resign from NewsReal

David Swindle

Perez Hilton Displays Strong Anti-Christian Bias, Not "Born Gay"

Young Conservatives of America

Boston Globe, New York Times, BBC, NPR owe Scott Lively an apology

"Progressive" Rallyists Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas

Culture of Vice

MURDER IN UGANDA

Ryan Sorba Appears on Glenn Beck for Helping to Take Down ACORN

Ryan Sorba on CNN, Right on the Edge

Ryan Sorba on Countdown with Keith Olberman

Ryan Sorba on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

Ryan Sorba on CNN, Right on the Edge

Ryan Sorba on CNN, Right on the Edge

Ryan Sorba on CNN

RINO Watch List: Jesse Hathaway

RINO Watch List: Lisa DePasquale

The “GOProud” Agenda

Are People Born Gay?

Ryan Sorba's Book, The Born Gay Hoax

Stephanie Mencimer: Anti-Christian/Pro-Sodomy Activist Welcome at Mother Jones?

Ryan Sorba Bodyboarding

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

Truth Academy: A Huge Success!

Bob Shwartz and Homosexual Hate Group Gay Liberation Network to Protest Truth Academy

David Horowitz Dumps Alex Knepper from NewsReal

Mariana Van Zeller: Journalist or Activist?

The Thesis of Capitalism by Ryan Sorba

New YCC Banner

Obama's Crazy Green jobs Czar

Pic for Internet Update

Ryan Sorba

Ryan Sorba

YCC Update

Anti-Christian Hate-Group Leader Mark Potok Attacks

Obama and "Torture"

TEA Party Tactics: Should You Encounter Leftist Infiltrators

Obama is Misleading the American People

Obama Strangles Free Market

Buchanan on Immigration

Obama's Address to the Nation

Cheney Criticizes President Obama

The Obama Nominee Fiasco

Times Reporter Philippe Naughton Disrespects Christianity

Step Down! Jerry Brown!

Get Out of Our Party RINO's!!

Cardinal Stafford criticizes Obama as ‘aggressive, disruptive and apocalyptic’

"Lesbian" Donor Gives Woman HIV Through Transplant

Hands Off Our Proposition!!! Religious Liberty at Stake!

Presidential candidate Alan Keyes, AIP leaders sue in CA court to obtain Obama citizenship proof, stop Secretary of State from certifying Electors

Homofascist Hate Crimes

Sodomites Threaten to Burn Down Churches and Murder Christians! Gays Committing Hate Crimes!

California Election Results

Negative Rights and the Role of Government in a Free and Virtuous Society

A Short Note on Rights

Voters Guide/Find Your Polling Place

Throw Your Nest Egg at Obama!

"Gay Marriage" = Nightmare!!! And Ca, Superintendent of Schools, Jack O'Connell Supports It? He Should be Fired Now!

Why is Barack Obama Always Late for Work??

NoBama! You Can Keep the Change!!!

Developing: Obama's Grandmother May Have Confirmed Kenyan Birth

Kathlene O'Loughlin
Marriage was not ordained by God. Marriage was a pagan ritual that Christians stole along with everything else (hello Easter anyone?) Native Americans performed two-spirit (lgbt) marriages before Columbus ever set foot here.

Kathlene O'Loughlin
this is the 2nd time I'm blocked in 2 days because bigots want to sweep the truth under their waspy rugs.
19 minutes ago · ·

Kathlene O'Loughlin
this is the 2nd time I'm blocked in 2 days because bigots want to sweep the truth under their waspy rugs.

Kathlene O'Loughlin
Maggie, Carmella deleted my link, I waited a few seconds and posted it again and got a popup from fb saying I'm blocked because of spam. Because Carmella is a coward and censored me.