Apr 15, 2011

Perez Hilton Displays Strong Anti-Christian Bias, Not "Born Gay"

By Ryan Sorba


Reacting to a recent Advocate.com article titled “Conservatives Declare War on the Word ‘Gay’” self-proclaimed “gay” internet sensation Mario Armando Lavandeira Jr., better known by his fake name Perez Hilton, launched into vitriolic attacks, calling Christian's “HOrrific.”

He went on to accuse all who adhere to the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic of hiding a “dispecable [sic] “homaphobia [sic],” simply for acknowledging the fact that ex-"gays" exist and that studies show change is possible for those who truly seek it.

Lavandeira’s cuss-out session, (or perhaps his sister Barbara Lavandeira’s cuss out session?) continued undisturbed in intensity. He went on to tag his post about Christians who refuse to agree that the “gay” agenda is a moral one as “bull sh--,” “bigots,” “offensive,” and “deplorable.”

Welcome to Holly-weird!

None of this language comes as a surprise. Mario and Barbara Lavandeira built their online empire as cyber-bullies, tearing people down like former Miss California, USA, Carrie Prejean, Hilary Duff, Chris Brown, Vanessa Hudgens, and the list goes on.

In 2010 Mario was accused of shooting and posting a panty-less photo of Miley Cyrus, who was only seventeen years old at the time, to his Twitter account, which included more than two million followers.

Now “Perez Hilton” has the nerve to declare Christians who stand for sexual decency “dipecable” [sic] for refusing to agree with the notion that people are “born gay.”

Why should Christians believe that people are “born gay,” Mario? Self-avowed “gays” don’t even believe that they were “born that way.”

Sorry Lady Gaga!

Homosexual activists openly admit—in numerous magazines, newspaper articles, books, and even national television shows—that people can and do change their so-called “sexual orientation.”

Activists who hold the view that human sexuality is fluid and flexible, (some publicly, some privately) are the same activists held up as heroes by the so-called “gay” community.

Take pro-sodomy activist Lillian Faderman for example. In the September 5, 1995 edition of the Advocate she stated the following:
We continue to demand rights, ignoring the fact that human sexuality is fluid and flexible, acting as though we are all stuck in our category forever. The narrow categories of identity politics are obviously deceptive.
The architects of the pro-sodomy movement Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen urge activists to abandon the truth for practical purposes:
It is time to learn from Madison Avenue and to roll out the big guns. We are talking about propaganda. For all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay –even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence.
Self-described “lesbian” Jennie Ruby agrees in a Lambda Book Report article:
I don’t think lesbians are born. I think they are made. The gay rights movement has (for many good, practical reasons) adopted largely an identity politics.

John DeCecco, from San Francisco State University, the editor of the Journal of Homosexuality and Paedika: The Journal of Pedophilia agrees:

The whole born gay and immutable characteristic idea is just gay and lesbian politics and aimed at achieving gay rights.
Dr. Vera Whisman is a lecturer for the Queer Studies Department at Ithaca College in New York. In her book, Queer by Choice: Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Politics of Identity she writes the following:
My conclusions question some of the fundamental basis upon which the gay and lesbian rights movement has been built. If we cannot make political claims based on an essential and shared nature, are we not left once again as individual deviants? Without an essentialist [born gay] foundation, do we have a viable politics?
Other well-known leaders of the “gay” political movement have acknowledged and/or observed the fluidity of sexuality in their own lives, as the following list indicates:

  • Camille Paglia

  • Tammy Bruce

  • Greg Louganis

  • Ellen Degeneres

  • Anne Heche

  • Chastity Bono

  • Joanne Loulan

  • Sarah Schulman

  • Rita Mae Brown

  • Rebecca Walker

  • Joan Nestle

  • John Preston

  • Dr. Martin Duberman

  • Dr. Charles Silverstein

  • Donna Minkowitz

  • Dr. Pat Cain

  • Martina Navratilova

  • Janis Ian

  • Melissa Etheridge

  • Wendy Caster

  • Kate Kendall

  • Dr. Dean Hamer

  • Dr. Karla Jay

  • Pat Califia

  • Susie Bright


The list goes on and on. Do Mario Lavandeira (Perez Hilton) and Stefani Jonanne Angelina Germanotta (Lady Gaga) really think the American public is na├»ve enough to believe their “born gay” lies?

Public “born gay” propaganda is a hoax. The things activists say about themselves publicly (and the negative things they say about their opponents) are carefully calculated lies.

Even when Jewish or Christian opponents of “born gay” rhetoric are saying what pro-“gay” activists know to be true, the activists deliberately lie about and demonize their opponents –and their message.

Pro-sodomy activists will even tell vicious lies about inciting violence to try to censor their opponent’s views in various forms of media.

This desire to censor the truth about the fluidity of same-sex attraction from the public is one of the most offensive characteristics of the practically neo-pagan pro-sodomy political movement –which habitually deceives, psychologically manipulates and even physically intimidates the media, public officials, the religious and medical communities, and anyone else they see as a threat to their lies.


One of the reasons activists want to censure opponents on the “born gay” issue is because the public would not support the “gay rights” agenda if the public knew that persons who have developed same-sex attraction are capable of change.

Several prominent “born gay” hoax activists have admitted to knowledge of this fact about the American public.

“Born gay” hoaxter Simon LeVay, who analyzed the hypothalamus in an effort to convince the world people are “born gay” revealed his secret objectives in an interview with The Advocate, June 1, 1993:

The Advocate: Do you really think that grounding homosexuality in biology can help win political equality? LeVay: All the civil rights legislation passed in the 60s is based on the knowledge that there is a genetic and immutable difference between blacks and whites. Of course, blacks are still discriminated against, but the legal advances they’ve made are based on those genetic differences. And I think that is a major stumbling block for our gaining the same protection as other groups.


There is a survey in the New York Times that broke down people on the basis of whether they thought gays and lesbians were born that way or whether it was a lifestyle choice. Across the board, those who thought gays and lesbians were born that way were more liberal and gay friendly.

The founder of the “Lesbian Avengers,” Sarah Schulman admits that lesbianism is a choice. She took note of the same study in her book My American History:
A recent poll in the New York Times showed that more people would be willing to support gay rights if they believed that gay people genetically could not help their orientation.
Pro-sodomy activists know that they are extremely vulnerable on this “born gay” point, which is one important reason why they are so desperate to have their opponents views censored by the media, and when possible, censored by the government.

In the Netherlands, activists have already succeeded in getting such a censorship law passed by the government. A Roman Catholic Bishop has faced prosecution there for making what “born gay” activists consider a negative statement about their behavior in a Roman Catholic seminary. The “Gay Times” reports:
Anti-gay Dutch Catholic Bishop may be prosecuted.

The bishop of the Roman Catholic diocese of Groningen in the northern Netherlands is under investigation for breaking a Dutch law, reports Rex Wockner.

In a lecture at Rolduc seminary, Bishop Wim Eijk told students that homosexuals suffered from ‘neurotic development disorder’ and said lesbians and gay men are incapable of making the commitment required for marriage.

The bishop’s controversial statements come at a time when the Dutch parliament is considering whether to introduce laws to allow lesbians and gay men to marry.

According to reports, laws banning discrimination against lesbians and gay men take precedence over freedom of religion and speech in the Netherlands.
Pro-“gay” activists are pushing to pass similar fascist laws all over the world. In fact, that’s what the left-wing socio-political construct that is the “gay” identity is all about –subjecting all people who disagree with the dangerous homosexual lifestyle to censorship and prosecution.

Now the health and happiness—even the lives—of many, and the common good of society depend upon the exposition and opposition of these lies and their destructive results.

By Ryan Sorba